sucof wrote: ↑26 Jan 2026, 17:24
basti313 wrote: ↑26 Jan 2026, 16:15
Yes, that is a classic Ferrari choice. 15°C and rain...
Imagining with a lot of hand gestures:
“Ah, when-a might be da best time to run, eh?"
"Eh, Tuesday, of course! We were always-a good on Tuesdays.”
I think weather plays very little role in this testing. Because nearly no one will push for lap times.
I think this is just wrong.
We see laptimes, that are on the level of fastest laptimes of usual races, currently at nearly 10°C less air temp, much less track temp and harder tires. If anything, they were fast today.
sucof wrote: ↑26 Jan 2026, 17:24
What they are doing is testing durability, and measuring everything they can if they correlate with their calculations, simulations.
The last time it rained on a timed race in Barcelona was in 1996....back at the day they had really good rain tires and lost more than 20sec on the laptime in the dry.
If it is wet and cold, they will be running easily 30sec off the pace. Sorry, but you do not learn anything at this pace that they did not learn during the filming day.
I think it is very much overrated how much they would learn with running the car around the track just to do milage. Time is over when they needed to do stress testing on track. For the engine they will anyways have enough data with the others running.
sucof wrote: ↑26 Jan 2026, 17:24
And remember, 1-2 teams will not even run in this test, or just a part of their allowed time... Ferrari are not the outliers here.
I think Ferrari can compensate the half or full day lost by a bad decision. Maybe it is even the same as for McLaren, that they went on Saturday to AVL...maybe Ferrari is the team, that delayed McLaren.
I do not think Williams can compensate missing this test.