2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
venkyhere
30
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

BorisTheBlade wrote:
29 Dec 2025, 14:54
What do you think about all of this? Is the approach flawed in any way? Would you like some other tracks / laps to be processed this way?
Appreciate your effort =D>
Since this a fastest lap attempt, battery is fully drained, similar to a quali lap. What would be more informative (and the 'hot potato' in this thread) is a typical race lap in the middle of a stint, where the driver has a target laptime and is preserving the tyres & battery SoC. Would like to see the same plot (same start and end locations as you've already done) for such a lap (pick a lap which is in the middle of a 4-5 lap cluster with hardly 1-2 tenths variance across them) and compare it with the above plot which you have already prepared. Also, if possible, a direct comparison of this fastest race lap with the quali lap to see whether the charge-discharge slopes are any different.
Also, if possible ( :D ) include the engine rpm & gear choice in the trace, it would be informative to check whether the changes in slope during the recharge phase is due to the gear changes or due to the algorithm itself
Last edited by venkyhere on 30 Dec 2025, 04:34, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
venkyhere
30
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

michl420 wrote:
29 Dec 2025, 12:08
A engine that have 1/3 less power need to run 1/3 longer to have the same output.
Why ? It's 1/3 less 'peak power', and what did you mean by 'same output' ?

User avatar
De Wet
15
Joined: 03 Jan 2024, 13:32

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post


michl420
michl420
24
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

venkyhere wrote:
30 Dec 2025, 04:29
michl420 wrote:
29 Dec 2025, 12:08
A engine that have 1/3 less power need to run 1/3 longer to have the same output.
Why ? It's 1/3 less 'peak power', and what did you mean by 'same output' ?
A 100 hp engine need to run 2h to have the same output (work) that a 200 hp engine has in 1h.

vorticism
vorticism
371
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

venkyhere wrote:
29 Dec 2025, 03:20
I think it will be very difficult to have an implementation where the the A-pedal input from driver 'does not linearly (atleast roughly) translate' to the operating point of the ICE. The driver relies on NVH to 'tune' himself to the power delivery of the car, and operating the ICE near peak power when throttle isn't 100% pressed (or even 0 pressed) is going to 'interfere' with the driving. This line of thought is what led me to think that % duration (in a race stint lap) of ICE operating near peak isn't going to change drastically, w.r.t previous hybrid era - instead of 'peaky' differences between deployment/recharge phases within a lap, the energy management would be more 'evenly spread' over a lap, just that the battery would claim a larger chunk of ICE output 'all the time'.
The part-demand (variable ICE output during variable PU output demand) regime seems important as far as feel goes. During the EBD days the drivers got used to off- and part-throttle idiosyncrasy, with the engine making noise when it shouldn't. Now with the MGUK variably arresting the engine, a similar situation presents: the ICE is making noise when it shouldn't. If the PU output rise and fall, including the engine braking feel, is dialed in, it may feel to the driver not too unusual. "Hot-blowing" of the MGUK at partial PU output demand.
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿