but instead you now have 2 bulky actuators, on on each side of the wing; so which scenario is better?
Intuitively, I’d say that two bulges in structures that are already present are more efficient than a third structure... but I also know that aerodynamics is often counter-intuitive.FerrariF60 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2026, 22:44but instead you now have 2 bulky actuators, on on each side of the wing; so which scenario is better?
Was watching this as well…Luscion wrote:
Depending on the amount of changes needed to the individual concepts and considering we’re in a budget cap era, maybe not even next season.
That could be easily solved by spring loading it, if the electrics fail it's forced back to high DF position
To copy that you certainly need to do quite a bit of work and spend some capital to remake your rear, so at minimum it would probably balance the wind tunnel time penalty given for winning, since then you are spending time on something they already researched.LM10 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 03:41Depending on the amount of changes needed to the individual concepts and considering we’re in a budget cap era, maybe not even next season.
Ferrari’s blown diffuser was likely the result of years of work which already started on the cars of the last couple of years when they step by step shrink wrapped the gearbox housing and positioned it far rearwards. To copy this basically the whole car needs to change - chassis, gearbox position, differential position, driveshaft position, PU concept.
