Yeah, compared to Stoffel time indeed..
If Alonso doing already his best ( I think he does ) there shouldn't be difference at his side ( of course f1 drivers drive in a different mode when smells the victory, even if the driver is Ralf Schumacher ). If Pu brings 0.3 ( I hope so ) and chassis 0.1 (totally 0.4 sec ) I think they will be in a good position compared races until now. I am more hopefull after reading Alo's and especially Hasegawa's exitement about race.
They didn't even get to finish the PU test program with Alonso not doing full pace runs because of the gearbox failure according to Hasegawa. And not to mention his most recent quotes say they have progressed further with the mapping in Sakura based on findings in Baku and they won't stop until the last minute before the GP. Mix that with the fact Hasegawa thought the update at Baku brought "more than 3 tenths"(I also doubt he's even close to overestimating), it's reasonable to assume the PU has progressed further since Baku and they've made a decent chunk of time. McLaren also bringing a chassis update. Things are looking possibly up.. (all appendages crossed)
They didn't race with the new PU update, only tested it briefly in practice.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Because it takes time to fully map the power unit under all conditions it encounters. It's easy to get a base map and get the engine working for full throttle pulls, but that's only the beginning, then you have to fine tune it, for part throttle, and different power unit modes. Then there's the ERS that has to be calibrated to take maximum advantage of the hardware changes.
Hard for me to gauge the Gap ...the lap is short in Austria. It's 2/3irds the legth of Baku. Just on that a 3 sec gap would be 2.godlameroso wrote: ↑04 Jul 2017, 13:09Gap in Canada was 2.2 seconds, gap in Baku was over 3 seconds. A few tenths won't make much difference. They need to find 2 seconds to have any real impact.
I'm pretty sure McLaren reached a point that they only care about performance. It's easier to make a quick engine reliable than the other way around.