With the performance of the car which we have seen today and the Gap in the WDC and WCC they can practically do this from tomorrow on.CHT wrote: I think it will be in RBR interest to wrap up both championship early and let Newey focus on 2014 at the factory.
Monza? Montreal? Silverstone?sennafan24 wrote: Race for race Alonso could depend on his car/team to not fail him internally, I do not recall any team or mechanical errors in 2012.
Those were all minor issues bar monza. But even that was in quali. Alonso's last mechanical DNF was in malaysia 2010.Gerhard Berger wrote:Monza? Montreal? Silverstone?sennafan24 wrote: Race for race Alonso could depend on his car/team to not fail him internally, I do not recall any team or mechanical errors in 2012.
What about the failed upgrade package in Singapore? Does that not count as the car/team failing him?
It´s been like that since the beginning of Formula 1. The only debatable thing is how much influence the best drivers can have over a particular result, a percentage that shrinks for every year that goes by.(2014)"That will be the chance for Ferrari and Mercedes to catch up with Vettel. Next year it might not be the best driver but the best car that wins the title."
Not really. In the '80s, the 'golden era', a driver for the 2nd or 3rd team would need to 'bring' 2 seconds at pretty much every race to beat the guys ahead. This era we're talking tenths.SectorOne wrote:Bernie bernie bernie...
It´s been like that since the beginning of Formula 1. The only debatable thing is how much influence the best drivers can have over a particular result, a percentage that shrinks for every year that goes by.(2014)"That will be the chance for Ferrari and Mercedes to catch up with Vettel. Next year it might not be the best driver but the best car that wins the title."
Certainly, Alan knows a bit more than us, but we can also speculate, can we?CHT wrote:Looks like we can start and thread on how soon will vettel wrap up 2014?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/110125
Careful. You might jinx himCHT wrote:Looks like we can start and thread on how soon will vettel wrap up 2014?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/110125
I think thats Permane intentionraymondu999 wrote:Careful. You might jinx himCHT wrote:Looks like we can start and thread on how soon will vettel wrap up 2014?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/110125
Come on, 2.5 seconds? In qualifying it was less than a tenth. Sure, Rosberg didn't have the race pace after the safety car, but that can be explained by rubber in his front wing which both caused a direct aerodynamic disadvantage and brought Webber closer to him in addition to taking some performance off his tyres. Then the difference was around 2 seconds. Vettel opened up a 22 second gap in 10 laps. If we compare Vettel's qualifying to Alonso, who usually is relatively strong in the race compared to qualifying, the difference was only around 1 second.CHT wrote:Looks like we can start and thread on how soon will vettel wrap up 2014?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/110125
Vettel was running a fresh supersoft tire on his last stint, while the rest of the front runner are on medium I think.Stradivarius wrote:Come on, 2.5 seconds? In qualifying it was less than a tenth. Sure, Rosberg didn't have the race pace after the safety car, but that can be explained by rubber in his front wing which both caused a direct aerodynamic disadvantage and brought Webber closer to him in addition to taking some performance off his tyres. Then the difference was around 2 seconds. Vettel opened up a 22 second gap in 10 laps. If we compare Vettel's qualifying to Alonso, who usually is relatively strong in the race compared to qualifying, the difference was only around 1 second.CHT wrote:Looks like we can start and thread on how soon will vettel wrap up 2014?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/110125
I think the first stint showed us a realistic picture of the difference in race pace between Vettel and Rosberg: Vettel opened up an 8-9 second gap to Rosberg in 15 laps, which means he was roughly 0.6 seconds faster. We also must remember that the gaps on this track with lap times around 1m50s are greater than the gaps on normal tracks with lap times around 1m30s, and with more time spent on straights, where there is little time to gain.
There was still much more room for drivers unlike today where everything is so optimized.mnmracer wrote:Not really. In the '80s, the 'golden era', a driver for the 2nd or 3rd team would need to 'bring' 2 seconds at pretty much every race to beat the guys ahead. This era we're talking tenths.SectorOne wrote:Bernie bernie bernie...
It´s been like that since the beginning of Formula 1. The only debatable thing is how much influence the best drivers can have over a particular result, a percentage that shrinks for every year that goes by.(2014)"That will be the chance for Ferrari and Mercedes to catch up with Vettel. Next year it might not be the best driver but the best car that wins the title."
Come on, 2.5 seconds? In qualifying it was less than a tenth. [/quote]Stradivarius wrote:CHT wrote:Looks like we can start and thread on how soon will vettel wrap up 2014?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/110125