Young, old… Pro, amateur… If you are a “driver”, driving that car has to be a dreamMtthsMlw wrote:Must be a young drivers dream to drive a car like this

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Young, old… Pro, amateur… If you are a “driver”, driving that car has to be a dreamMtthsMlw wrote:Must be a young drivers dream to drive a car like this
Dam straight!SmallSoldier wrote: ↑11 Jul 2021, 18:09Young, old… Pro, amateur… If you are a “driver”, driving that car has to be a dreamMtthsMlw wrote:Must be a young drivers dream to drive a car like this
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
djos wrote: ↑11 Jul 2021, 23:51Dam straight!SmallSoldier wrote: ↑11 Jul 2021, 18:09Young, old… Pro, amateur… If you are a “driver”, driving that car has to be a dreamMtthsMlw wrote:Must be a young drivers dream to drive a car like this
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Personally I always blamed Max Mosley and their Ferrari International Assistance for the whole Spygate and Liegate. For Max Mosley it was an opportunity to do damage to Ron Dennis as they were at each other's throats from the moment Mosley became the FIA President and it was all a set up. A lot of Ferrari's championships on the 2000s were pushed by him while there were decisions and rules that would usually damage Mclaren Mercedes performance and of course Ferrari gaining an unfair advantage of money compared to the competition. In the end the team paid a heavy price on money and losing Mercedes having spent 8 years to be able to reunite and be back on the top 3. Makes me wonder what would have happened if Mclaren and Mercedes were not split up. Would they have been able to get 7 Consequtive championships?ScottR267 wrote: ↑12 Jul 2021, 14:19https://the-race.com/formula-1/video-th ... -f1-split/
Is well documented of course, however in case of any interest to anyone.
Impossible to know… But, if the expenditure would have the same (Mercedes approx 500 million per year and McLaren approx 200 million per year)… Then, it is safe to say that most probably McLaren would have been behind MercedesDarth-Piekus wrote:Personally I always blamed Max Mosley and their Ferrari International Assistance for the whole Spygate and Liegate. For Max Mosley it was an opportunity to do damage to Ron Dennis as they were at each other's throats from the moment Mosley became the FIA President and it was all a set up. A lot of Ferrari's championships on the 2000s were pushed by him while there were decisions and rules that would usually damage Mclaren Mercedes performance and of course Ferrari gaining an unfair advantage of money compared to the competition. In the end the team paid a heavy price on money and losing Mercedes having spent 8 years to be able to reunite and be back on the top 3. Makes me wonder what would have happened if Mclaren and Mercedes were not split up. Would they have been able to get 7 Consequtive championships?ScottR267 wrote: ↑12 Jul 2021, 14:19https://the-race.com/formula-1/video-th ... -f1-split/
Is well documented of course, however in case of any interest to anyone.
Norbert Haug stated that Mclaren went into discussion with Mercedes about buying more shares, but that the terms weren't great and then the Brawn opportunity appeared, and this presented Mercedes with a new path.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑12 Jul 2021, 18:02Personally I always blamed Max Mosley and their Ferrari International Assistance for the whole Spygate and Liegate. For Max Mosley it was an opportunity to do damage to Ron Dennis as they were at each other's throats from the moment Mosley became the FIA President and it was all a set up. A lot of Ferrari's championships on the 2000s were pushed by him while there were decisions and rules that would usually damage Mclaren Mercedes performance and of course Ferrari gaining an unfair advantage of money compared to the competition. In the end the team paid a heavy price on money and losing Mercedes having spent 8 years to be able to reunite and be back on the top 3. Makes me wonder what would have happened if Mclaren and Mercedes were not split up. Would they have been able to get 7 Consequtive championships?ScottR267 wrote: ↑12 Jul 2021, 14:19https://the-race.com/formula-1/video-th ... -f1-split/
Is well documented of course, however in case of any interest to anyone.
I'm sure one of the thoughts in Mercedes mind at the time was along the lines of- If we don't buy Brawn, who will?mwillems wrote: ↑12 Jul 2021, 18:57Norbert Haug stated that Mclaren went into discussion with Mercedes about buying more shares, but that the terms weren't great and then the Brawn opportunity appeared, and this presented Mercedes with a new path.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑12 Jul 2021, 18:02Personally I always blamed Max Mosley and their Ferrari International Assistance for the whole Spygate and Liegate. For Max Mosley it was an opportunity to do damage to Ron Dennis as they were at each other's throats from the moment Mosley became the FIA President and it was all a set up. A lot of Ferrari's championships on the 2000s were pushed by him while there were decisions and rules that would usually damage Mclaren Mercedes performance and of course Ferrari gaining an unfair advantage of money compared to the competition. In the end the team paid a heavy price on money and losing Mercedes having spent 8 years to be able to reunite and be back on the top 3. Makes me wonder what would have happened if Mclaren and Mercedes were not split up. Would they have been able to get 7 Consequtive championships?ScottR267 wrote: ↑12 Jul 2021, 14:19https://the-race.com/formula-1/video-th ... -f1-split/
Is well documented of course, however in case of any interest to anyone.
“We would have loved to continue[with Mclaren], but Mercedes wanted to do a further step – a works team. In these days, people probably don’t remember but it was very common that you had an engine partnership.
“It was Williams-BMW, it was McLaren-Mercedes. Then Honda entered this works team, then it was Brawn GP.
“We had a good opportunity because Ross and Nick Fry knew they could not go on their own for years and years, so they looked for a partner and then we could make it happen.”
Did the Mclaren issues push this somewhat? Possibly, but Merecedes still would have enjoyed working with Mclaren with a higher ownership stake but unsurprisingly it didn't pan through.
You could easily put an argument together that suggests that Merc just hit a fork an in the road and that fork was always coming along. Brawn GP offered an amazing opportunity for Merc, to take a fast car with a Merc engine already fitted and some of the most talented people in the paddock like Ross Brawn.
To be quite honest, it was a gift horse and the team was cheap and when that opportunity arose, even if Merc weren't actively looking to become a works team, they would have found it hard to ignore that opportunity.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/mercedes- ... over-2010/