That's not true in any way.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑10 Sep 2026, 11:41Max though says at the end the same thing as Lando. No matter the rules the best drivers will always shine in the end.
That's not true in any way.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑10 Sep 2026, 11:41Max though says at the end the same thing as Lando. No matter the rules the best drivers will always shine in the end.
You ever remember Charles hiding behind his finger? He is so honest that some times i think it's bad for him.
Nah.woocasz wrote: ↑09 Sep 2026, 12:30In your opinion, who is a driver who’s the ‘complete package’?Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑09 Sep 2026, 11:23Or simply the new rules favor the complete package and some drivers (Charles, Piastri, Russell) don't have what it takes if they can't adapt. How many times has Norris changed his driving style and adapted. He even said it on his interview. The new rules are different (bad maybe) but no matter the rules the best drivers will still shine. It's not the first time that happened and not the last time it will happen. By the way woocaz. The score so far is 8-5 in races (hits from other drivers or Ferrari being incompetent), 5-4 in podiums, 0-4 in crashes. A cost of 30 to 40 points. Add those and the distance would be more than 60 to 70 points. Doesn't reflect well on Leclerc on the contrary being behind a 41 year old when he should be faster due to age.with half of them Hamilton having faced unfair penalties,
And really mate? You are insinuating that Antonelli is fast due to the new rules when he gave a masterclass driving in just a few laps passing his teammate two times last Sunday? Even Max adapted after a few races.
Maybe the battery change (60-40) might change things again (I doubt it as you still need to save battery) but what are you going to say if the right order doesn't change and becomes even worse for Charles?
Hamilton: easily beaten by Russell 22–24, destroyed by Charles in 25, he is on par with Charles in 26 Venturi cars almost retire him so NOT complete package
Norris: WDC in 25 (with the help of the team) good in Venturi cars, its getting better in current regs.
so yeah, complete package
Russell: good in Venturi cars, beat Hamilton 22-24, bad in the current regs, destroyed by rookie
so, NOT complete package
Verstappen: a weak team-mates, so hard to compare, struggling in current regs, but still complete package
Leclerc: good in Venturi cars, nearly perfect last season, on par with Hamilton in the current regs
so, complete package? (with a small question mark)
dont get me startedwith half of them Hamilton having faced unfair penalties,![]()
Monaco: speeding in the pitlane 5s
Silverstone: falsestart 5s
Spa: he hit Russell 5s
Hungary: 3-grid penalty for impeding Oscar + speeding in the pitalne 5s
Zandvoort: double yellow infringement
Which of these penalties is unfair?
Yes, though I think the original rumour was that one of the ADUOs would be the “proper” 2026 engine (as opposed to the 2025 evo). I guess that was always optimistic and could explain why the ADUO 2 wasn’t as big as originally rumoured - ie they realised it was never going to be possible to get a whole new engine done in time to bring with a reasonable amount of races still left, so they did what they could for now and punted the rest to next year.Waz wrote: ↑10 Sep 2026, 13:31I don't know why, but I was sure that was always the plan? I must have read it on here near the beginning of the season already, before Miami.
The info then was that the engine being used in 2026 is a development of the 2025 ICE to meet current regulations. They were running out of time for the 2026 engine to prove reliable.
2027 was always going to be a new design, obviously with tricks learned from the Mercedes.
And we are back to this...
Makes for an interesting comparison of how much he'll lose to Lewis on straights.
I'd be willing to bet the FIA decision to move away from a 50/50 split and the other PU related changes for next year also played a big part. It would be unwise to dump a bunch of cash into a design that will need to be changed for next season anyway.f1316 wrote: ↑10 Sep 2026, 23:30Yes, though I think the original rumour was that one of the ADUOs would be the “proper” 2026 engine (as opposed to the 2025 evo). I guess that was always optimistic and could explain why the ADUO 2 wasn’t as big as originally rumoured - ie they realised it was never going to be possible to get a whole new engine done in time to bring with a reasonable amount of races still left, so they did what they could for now and punted the rest to next year.
Lewis riding over curbs hard at Madring disagrees with your theory though!Badger wrote: ↑10 Sep 2026, 11:00These cars have similar suspension set-ups to the GE cars, with massive anti-dive on the front. They don't dive or move the centre of pressure anything like the pre 2022 cars. One of the reasons for this, I would argue, is that they do not require late braking because of energy management. Better to just have a stable platform. Also, since the fancy rear suspensions were banned (inerters banned since 2022) it's just harder to make a suspension that moves the centre of pressure during braking.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑09 Sep 2026, 21:39Hamilton has, throughout his career, majored on late braking and using weight transfer and the associated movement of the centre of pressure, to produce lap time. Go back and watch his performances in junior formulae - they're available online.Badger wrote: ↑09 Sep 2026, 14:35
I don't buy into the narrative that Lewis only struggled because of GE, I think he was also declining with age. There's also a big difference in how they "struggled". Lewis was clearly not capable of driving those cars to the same pace as his teammates, hence why he was being beaten by a large margin in quali (24 and 25). Charles now is probably driving the car close to the limit, and so is Lewis, because there is basically no pace difference between them over one lap. The issue at hand is that how you reach the limit has changed, and some (like Max) would argue it's easier now because it doesn't require the same commitment and edge feel. It's software driven, energy driven.
He has generally majored at those circuits that have require rotation of the car under braking rather than carrying maximum speed through very fast corners. Indeed, he admitted as much early in his Mercedes days comparing his performance with Rosberg (at a time he was beating Rosberg in the title race, not in 2016).
The tunnel cars (not GE, please, as all F1 cars have been GE cars for decades and they still are GE cars) required the suspension to be set up to prevent weight transfer and especially movement of the centre of pressure. That immediately took a chunk of time away from a driver that had spent a career using those things to extract lap time.
One only has to look at his performance before, during and after the tunnel car regs to see this is true. Fast before, relatively crap during, back to being fast after.
And suggesting that Hamilton is quick now and others are slow because the cars require a driving style that uses the computers to be fast, suggests that the guys who aren't so fast now are limited to only being fast in cars that don't require a bit of mental gymnastics. And frankly, as a Hamilton fan, I'd never say the guy was the sharpest knife in the block so if he can manage these cars and others can't, what does that say about them?
Who is "slow"? Charles certainly isn't, as we have already established he is every bit as quick as Lewis in quali. In fact all the top 3 teams have teammates qualifying within one tenth of each other. Even at RB the quali gap has come down to like 2,5 tenths. The pattern of convergence is undeniable. No one is slow, everyone is fast. How can this be when it has never been the case before? I would postulate the answer is right in front of us in that Max quote that was posted here earlier. "These cars are numb to your driver inputs".