The first few elements on the Williams look just the same as the 2017 Mclaren behind the barge boards. Williams actually has a turning vane on top of theirs. I don't think any of the other teams have that. Mclaren doesn't have the 'teeth' at the diffuser throat entrance like just about all of the other teams do now. They didn't have them in 2017 either.godlameroso wrote: ↑26 Jun 2018, 18:41The Williams also has no mid wing. And their device behind the bargeboards isn't channeling air under the floor.dren wrote: ↑26 Jun 2018, 18:17Who knows. You'd think they'd carry them over if they were useful to the car design. Most of the other teams have them. They sure aren't helping the Williams car.godlameroso wrote: ↑26 Jun 2018, 17:28I posted this in another thread
https://imgr2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/M ... 168490.jpg
https://cdn-7.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... detail.jpg
What did last year's car have that this year's car doesn't, look right behind the bargeboard, that wavy wing that aimed air under the floor is missing in this year's car. WHY?
https://imgr2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/W ... 171894.jpg
Maybe McLaren has to re-engineer part of the car in order to make the changes in this area that they now know they need to make, which is why it's taking so long. They're literally building a B spec chassis.
Red Bull likes performance based contracts. Mclaren may be offering him more for a base salary. He's said he wants to win a championship and feels like he can. I don't know why he'd move to Mclaren for any sum of money.Ground Effect wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 15:10This is also a bit off topic, but I think below article suggests Daniel is looking for more money, talking about knowing one's worth. From all indications, Mclaren so far offering much more than Red Bull willing to?
http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/ ... -of-career
I fully agree, Mclaren shouldn't even be on his mind. The part of the article that caught my attention was when he regarded his decision the second most important one he's ever made. Ferrari aren't an option, Mercedes, highly unlikely. So it basically leaves staying with Red Bull or Mclaren? Should be a no brainer. I'm assuming staying with Red Bull shouldn't be regarded as such a monumental decision. So, except he's considering Mclaren...dren wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 15:44Red Bull likes performance based contracts. Mclaren may be offering him more for a base salary. He's said he wants to win a championship and feels like he can. I don't know why he'd move to Mclaren for any sum of money.Ground Effect wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 15:10This is also a bit off topic, but I think below article suggests Daniel is looking for more money, talking about knowing one's worth. From all indications, Mclaren so far offering much more than Red Bull willing to?
http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/ ... -of-career
There could be some time constraint maybe? If RBR will only contract until 2021 but he wants a one year possibly with a get out if an offer comes along they would not agree as one wants stability the other opportunity.Ground Effect wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 17:42I fully agree, Mclaren shouldn't even be on his mind. The part of the article that caught my attention was when he regarded his decision the second most important one he's ever made. Ferrari aren't an option, Mercedes, highly unlikely. So it basically leaves staying with Red Bull or Mclaren? Should be a no brainer. I'm assuming staying with Red Bull shouldn't be regarded as such a monumental decision. So, except he's considering Mclaren...dren wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 15:44Red Bull likes performance based contracts. Mclaren may be offering him more for a base salary. He's said he wants to win a championship and feels like he can. I don't know why he'd move to Mclaren for any sum of money.Ground Effect wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 15:10This is also a bit off topic, but I think below article suggests Daniel is looking for more money, talking about knowing one's worth. From all indications, Mclaren so far offering much more than Red Bull willing to?
http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/ ... -of-career
No team will sign contracts beyond 2020.Big Tea wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 18:04There could be some time constraint maybe? If RBR will only contract until 2021 but he wants a one year possibly with a get out if an offer comes along they would not agree as one wants stability the other opportunity.Ground Effect wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 17:42I fully agree, Mclaren shouldn't even be on his mind. The part of the article that caught my attention was when he regarded his decision the second most important one he's ever made. Ferrari aren't an option, Mercedes, highly unlikely. So it basically leaves staying with Red Bull or Mclaren? Should be a no brainer. I'm assuming staying with Red Bull shouldn't be regarded as such a monumental decision. So, except he's considering Mclaren...
Using the Mclaren offer as a wedge would show RBR there is an alternative to take it or leave it.
No, the other way, one year. See who is retiring from Ferrari etcRonDennis wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 18:09No team will sign contracts beyond 2020.Big Tea wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 18:04There could be some time constraint maybe? If RBR will only contract until 2021 but he wants a one year possibly with a get out if an offer comes along they would not agree as one wants stability the other opportunity.Ground Effect wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 17:42
I fully agree, Mclaren shouldn't even be on his mind. The part of the article that caught my attention was when he regarded his decision the second most important one he's ever made. Ferrari aren't an option, Mercedes, highly unlikely. So it basically leaves staying with Red Bull or Mclaren? Should be a no brainer. I'm assuming staying with Red Bull shouldn't be regarded as such a monumental decision. So, except he's considering Mclaren...
Using the Mclaren offer as a wedge would show RBR there is an alternative to take it or leave it.
There is an old saying that goes "hell hath no fury like a lover scorned".PhillipM wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 18:24Depends how far ahead he's looking, if he thinks RB might struggle next year while they get on top of the Honda packaging as well as new rules, and he's thinking 2021 with the new ruleset might be a turnaround for Mclaren (who still have the option to run the Honda then if it's looking likely to blow the Renault away), maybe he'll gamble.
It'd take a huge commitment from Mclaren, and he'd have to have been treated pretty poorly by RB (but the, up 'till this year he was, and the MV collision won't have helped) this year to even consider it.
Honda option for Mclaren in 2021? As a customer, right?PhillipM wrote: ↑27 Jun 2018, 18:24Depends how far ahead he's looking, if he thinks RB might struggle next year while they get on top of the Honda packaging as well as new rules, and he's thinking 2021 with the new ruleset might be a turnaround for Mclaren (who still have the option to run the Honda then if it's looking likely to blow the Renault away), maybe he'll gamble.
It'd take a huge commitment from Mclaren, and he'd have to have been treated pretty poorly by RB (but the, up 'till this year he was, and the MV collision won't have helped) this year to even consider it.