Dutch aricle Van Haren
https://www.telegraaf.nl/sport/autospor ... 45199.html
His race was over when they pitted him too late.
Surely the car was good enough with its mythical floor upgrade to fend off a Haas and a Sauber with 3 laps to go? If he couldn't fend off a Haas and a Sauber, how was he going to stay in the top 10? Lawson and Hadjar were even faster than Bearman and Hulkenberg.
If he held off the Haas (who had a barn door wing btw), then Hulkenberg would never have gotten to him in time.
Leclerc is not 'below average' in wet conditions. lol The guy still held Max back in a car with a worse setup for the conditions. Truth is the Ferrari itself has never had the characteristics to excel in the wet. And it was much easier for Lewis to look good temporarily when he reverted his whole setup to be good in the wet, and it's why his progress completely stalled out when things dried out and even a Williams was out of his reach.avantman wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:08Ferrari? You mean Leclerc specifically, because Hamilton was the fastest car on track except for 2 Mclaren. Leclerc is bellow average driver in such conditions and yeah he had lower downforce setup which did not suit the conditions and very short first stint. On medium he easily drove away. never looking like he was driving a slower car. and by the way, neither in Austria nor at Silverstone did that Ferrari (even driven by 40+ old Lewis) looked like a slower car than the RB21. Ferrari is already faster again,just like they were last year. The only surprise it took them so long this year.
Hard to believe it was not deliberate. This whole game is fixed.AR3-GP wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 22:36In Silverstone they had the low downforce wing with the dry setup. Race control was so eager to have that race started even with the showers, spray, and low visibility. They switched the DRS on in record time on a wet track. In Spa Red Bull gamble on actually racing in the wet like Silverstone. Race control starts the race after the track is nearly dry...then refuses to switch on the DRS until it's bone dry and everybody is on slicks. I wouldn't call it deliberate but there's no consistency in this championship except Max consistently getting screwed since Austria.
Max's engineer:pantherxxx wrote: ↑28 Jul 2025, 00:38Hard to believe it was not deliberate. This whole game is fixed.AR3-GP wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 22:36In Silverstone they had the low downforce wing with the dry setup. Race control was so eager to have that race started even with the showers, spray, and low visibility. They switched the DRS on in record time on a wet track. In Spa Red Bull gamble on actually racing in the wet like Silverstone. Race control starts the race after the track is nearly dry...then refuses to switch on the DRS until it's bone dry and everybody is on slicks. I wouldn't call it deliberate but there's no consistency in this championship except Max consistently getting screwed since Austria.
https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/lauren ... -red-bull/Rennie continued: “Yeah, understood. I think, if we knew the conditions were going to be like this, that we weren’t going to be driving in the wet much, then, yeah, it would have changed our rear wing choice.”