Yeah, that's nonsense. Clearly the sidepods are huge in reality.
To me it seems like a shadow/reflection that moves around as the car turns.
Yeah, that's nonsense. Clearly the sidepods are huge in reality.
To me it seems like a shadow/reflection that moves around as the car turns.
vorticism wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026, 20:49Confirmed on Audi’s car:vorticism wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025, 01:17Some guesses at what we’ll see in a couple of months:
Front pushrod. The front wing pressure distribution has changed. The largest part of the wing is now outboard, the opposite of the 2022 formula which had the largest part of the wing inboard. This will alter the flow fields between the front wheels.
...
Rake. The question is how much. The rear wing allowance seems small relative to the size of the front wing, and there are no beam wings. Use rake to increase overall downforce that is necessarily rearward of the front axle. That said--does rake conflict with using higher center of gravity pushrods at the rear.
...
https://i.postimg.cc/B6QXSC2J/Screensho ... -01-PM.png
Confirmed on Audi's car:vorticism wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025, 01:17Some guesses at what we’ll see in a couple of months:
...
Rear pushrod. The diffuser is not as tall but the onset of the diffuser remains in approximately the same location as the 2022 formula. It is perhaps better to not risk impinging upon it with pullrod mechanisms, although the higher CoG of a pushrod assembly could conflict with the use of rake.

Less efficient would point to more heat losses, especially considering that the power deficit is due mainly to the lower compression ratio (at least in theory). Making less power with similar fuel should result in more heat losses.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026, 22:53[...]
Very conservative side pod openings. These engines will be less efficient and less powerful at the same time. So the big openings are interesting.
[...]
Couldn't this just be a sign of an A-car made for the barcelona test? That is, looking at reliability where they progressively close openings?matteosc wrote: ↑10 Jan 2026, 13:58Less efficient would point to more heat losses, especially considering that the power deficit is due mainly to the lower compression ratio (at least in theory). Making less power with similar fuel should result in more heat losses.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026, 22:53[...]
Very conservative side pod openings. These engines will be less efficient and less powerful at the same time. So the big openings are interesting.
[...]
Not sure about how the lack of MGU-H affects heating.
I was wondering the same thing