Ben1980 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 12:02
mwillems wrote: ↑10 Feb 2026, 11:50
It's interesting that outlets suggest that Red Bull may also take sides against Mercedes. Either they haven't exploited a loophole or haven't done it as well, if it is the case. Or they have a different loophole.
Still, I doubt that anything will happen in the first half of the season, if at all this year, other than to free up other teams to develop more or sooner.
If the fia are putting out videos, all but calling out Merc, then things will happen, probably quite quickly.
I think it will be to restrict Merc rather than allow others to go above the limit.
The FIA have put itself in a terrible spot. They want to avoid an arms race of engine development, but this grey area opens Pandora's box. If they don't find a solution, there will be significant investment from others in 2026, which is counter to Audi's (maybe Honda's) needs.
If the ratio is due to thermal expansion, I could see allowing it for a year and limiting next year with a new hot-dynamic test/sensor.
If the rumour of "pockets" being used is true, that is, in my opinion, beyond the grey area, and the FIA will need a solution for Australia.
The real issue is the advantage it is generating. I don't think the FIA will even know this. It is in Merc's interest that their engine is only slightly ahead, so as long as they are winning, they should limit performance and continually increase as the other catch up.
Could the FIA give the other manufacturers ADUO credits, with the agreement of Merc, outside the 2-4%, to allow them to "catch up"? I just don't see how this reconciles. Either Merc PU teams will be dominant or nerfed. It is hard to see how parity or near parity on the PU will be achieved, which is unfortunate from a competitive F1 POV.