China, but yeah. However the version Vettel chose had better tyre wear through better balance, let's not forget.bhallg2k wrote:I just think back to earlier this year when Red Bull brought two versions of the RB8 to Monaco: one with Coanda exhaust and one without. The former, which Webber chose, was fast but tricky. The latter, which Vettel chose, was (relatively) slow but stable. I think the results spoke for themselves.
Why? Look at the Ferraris from 2000-2008. They were fast, and I wouldn't call them tricky. Even the 2009-2011 Ferraris weren't tricky. They weren't the quickest, but they were balanced. The 2011 Ferrari had trouble getting tyre heat, but it was a balanced car in terms of front-to-rear grip and under/oversteer.If Vettel ever moves to Ferrari, he's likely going to get yearly doses of either "fast, but tricky" or just plain old "tricky,"
Widely considered doesn't equal the truth. The earth was once widely considered to be the center of the solar system, and flat.a teammate in Alonso who's widely considered to be as good or better by virtually every metric a driver can be measured.
I've known people - and had times myself - when I've seen people living great lives and making great money (I'm talking 6 figure monthly salary) and they just got so bored of their routine they decided to move on - or sometimes start over.He'd have to get awfully bored with perpetually winning at Red Bull to even consider taking up such a challenge.
I don´t really see the logic behind this if everyone meaning RBR, Ferrari and Vettel knew this.scuderiafan wrote:Denial is the first step of acceptance, Vettel will be switching his bull for a stallion in 2014.
By monster I assume you mean all-conquering opponent-killer as opposed to a monster like the F2012 was early season.Nando wrote:What if RBR produces another monster in 2013?
I agree. I think operationally, RBR are probably the strongest team in F1 right now. They're good at strategy, they're good at reacting to data and switching strategies, they're good at pitstops - can't really go wrong with them at the moment, despite their lack of history and pedigree (compared to rivals McLaren and Ferrari)RBR is a fantastic team right now
In F1 encyclopedia that is what we would call a dog. Pretty quick dog as it liked the rain.raymondu999 wrote:as opposed to a monster like the F2012 was early season.
Rubbish. The early season F2012 was clearly a dugong rather than a dog. Hence why it was so quick in the wetNando wrote:In F1 encyclopedia that is what we would call a dog. Pretty quick dog as it liked the rain.raymondu999 wrote:as opposed to a monster like the F2012 was early season.
I wouldn't trust him to sell me a used sports car...astracrazy wrote:now been denied by Luca di Montezemolo
I don't think you could be more wrong. Vettel wants to be better everyone. This is a driver who is so confident in his own ability that he will risk a race win on the final lap in order to secure the fastest lap of the race. We hear his engineer almost begging him to be careful and he still goes for it.bhallg2k wrote: I don't see Vettel moving to Ferrari simply because I don't think he wants that challenge. It's not his style.
Because Vettel knows that no team is unbeatable. RedBull are the guys to beat today but then Ferrari were the guys to beat in the early 2000s, Williams were the guys to beat in the early '90s. In 1993, if you'd said to a driver "Williams or Benetton next year" most would have jumped to Williams. Same in 1995. By '96?Nando wrote: What if RBR produces another monster in 2013? Why would he leave? I mean it´s not like Mclaren with their "team efforts".
RBR is a fantastic team right now, i can´t see why he would change,
So in essence you want Schumacher to leave in the middle of his ferrari dynasty?Just_a_fan wrote:Because Vettel knows that no team is unbeatable. RedBull are the guys to beat today but then Ferrari were the guys to beat in the early 2000s, Williams were the guys to beat in the early '90s. In 1993, if you'd said to a driver "Williams or Benetton next year" most would have jumped to Williams. Same in 1995. By '96?Nando wrote: What if RBR produces another monster in 2013? Why would he leave? I mean it´s not like Mclaren with their "team efforts".
RBR is a fantastic team right now, i can´t see why he would change,
Who'd have thought that, by 2000, Ferrari, a team that hadn't won in 20 years, would start a winning run that would lead the FIA to change the rules because it had become too boring and predictable.
A driver who wants to break records needs to take risks now and then. Changing to Ferrari is a risk, yes, but it's a reasonable risk. And if it pays off, he has the chance to beat the guy who is currently considered the man to beat. Vettel has a small monkey on his back. That monkey is the issue of his ability to race against a world class driver in equal machinery. Moving to Ferrari gives him the chance to kill that monkey. If he goes there and beats Alonso (even if he doesn't win the title) then he improves his position in the pantheon of the best drivers. I reckon Vettel would take that over another drivers' title.
The counter to this is obviously Williams in the 90's. They must hold the record for dumping drivers after they won the WDC with them the year prior.Nando wrote:Just_a_fan wrote:Nando wrote:You dont leave when you had a good car the year before, you leave when your current car over a year has not been able to fight for the championship.
Especially when you have a car designer that is the most succesful one in the business and you have the best team bar none behind you.
How is setting the fastest lap in an RB8 with a great margin of lead over second place a risk? He can do it comfortably and even if his engineers tell him that the tyres are shot, he can feel it and say "bollocks". Setting a fastest lap when you can comfortably do it is not exactly a risk.Just_a_fan wrote:...This is a driver who is so confident in his own ability that he will risk a race win on the final lap in order to secure the fastest lap of the race. We hear his engineer almost begging him to be careful and he still goes for it.
...
But then you have to ask yourself if realistically Red Bull would "dump" Vettel.Cold Fussion wrote:The counter to this is obviously Williams in the 90's. They must hold the record for dumping drivers after they won the WDC with them the year prior.