The problem with saying George is trouncing Lewis, is that the points gap doesn't reflect that and a DNF in a race you were already going backwards in once the track got damp (and it was damp most of the race)and a disqualification for an illegal car because you got put on a strategy you were lucky enough to try only because your race pace relative the other top cars put you so far out of contention, at the front, doesn't change that.Cs98 wrote: ↑29 Nov 2024, 23:44Not a great sign when you have to argue like this.GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑29 Nov 2024, 23:09Every time someone tries to disagree they just prove my point.Your point is largely made up of premises that many people don't agree with. The chief among them being that George is "barely beating" Lewis. To me, he is trouncing him. I gave you the numbers before, 12-6 in the races, 17-5 in quali. Points have been made to look closer than they should be based on Spa and Silverstone.That's my point. This is supposed to be George's best ever performance at Merc, but he's only just about beating a team mate on his way to another team, whos having his worst ever season in the sport.
As far as it being the worst season for Lewis, maybe it is, but that's not a fact, that's an opinion. 2011 wasn't great in my book, neither was 2022 against a first year teammate in Lewis' team.
Furthermore you seem to think that comparing WDC position between years is some sort of relevant metric. It's not. It's mostly a function of car performance relative to the competition. This year Merc has been solidly 4th best, last year they finished 2nd in the WCC, so of course that will influence your WDC positions. Getting in the top 5 this year was simply not feasible with their car, even if you add in Spa and Silverstone for George. Arguing as if relative car performance is static makes for an awful argument.
If you want to go that route then let's talk about multiple instances of Lewis' car needing pit lane starts due to suspension parts not being built correctly in the garage/unplanned engine component changesetc or yet to be properly explained dumbassery like the Singapore Grand Prix where even George in a press conference during the weekend openly/surprisingly expressed that he knew Merc effed Lewis out of a podium position with the strategy as soon as he saw what tyres they put him on to start the race.
Anyway.
That's why I say again, if somehow Lewis has two very good races and they both end up within single digits of one another at the end of the season, calling this season the best ever season for George just seems weird.
If anything, it would symbolise that despite the quali disparity, he hasn't actually capitalised. Evidenced mostly by the fact that you could generally expect the two drivers to end races at least in somewhat similar positions despite what happens in qualifying.
Which again sounds like a weird thing to say about a best season ever.
Which makes it seem like the only reason the above would point toward such accolades is because it's Lewis he beat.
But even then, you're supposedly now not allowed to say that it was not a version of Lewis at his best, because apparently not everyone agrees he's had a bad season or that his quali performance (i.e literally the thing he's known for and what allowed George to finish ahead most of the time) has been uncharacteristically poor.
If it was Antonelli with those head to head stats in Lewis' position, would anyone at Merc be feeling so proud about 6th and 7th in the WDC?