from where did you get the info about compromised ride height ? please point to the source.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 22:37I can't doom them today. The car was already compromised by the ride height. If the car was in the correct height it could have won today.
You have to do the ifs, buts, and cuts for all drivers before knowing who would/could/should be ahead. More or less not worth any thought.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:19Without the engine DNF and Canada crash/DNF Lando would be clear ahead.
They remained with the same set up as for the sprint, and since they did not finish any laps in it, they were not able to make the step forward as the others did in terms of set up since they did not get any real data from it.venkyhere wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:23from where did you get the info about compromised ride height ? please point to the source.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 22:37I can't doom them today. The car was already compromised by the ride height. If the car was in the correct height it could have won today.
Just rumours isnt it.venkyhere wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:23from where did you get the info about compromised ride height ? please point to the source.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 22:37I can't doom them today. The car was already compromised by the ride height. If the car was in the correct height it could have won today.
Stella just confirmed that without the sprint data they didn’t fully maximise the parameters.venkyhere wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:23from where did you get the info about compromised ride height ? please point to the source.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 22:37I can't doom them today. The car was already compromised by the ride height. If the car was in the correct height it could have won today.
AR3-GP wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:24You have to do the ifs, buts, and cuts for all drivers before knowing who would/could/should be ahead. More or less not worth any thought.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:19Without the engine DNF and Canada crash/DNF Lando would be clear ahead.
Isn’t it more like Red Bull have developed a flexi front wing mark 2 where as McLaren are still on the Spanish mark 1 spec?
This is a kind of wishful thinking.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:37This car would have won without the crash in the sprint.
CjC wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:39Shouldnt they be like on the budget cap?Rikhart wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:35Isn’t it more like Red Bull have developed a flexi front wing mark 2 where as McLaren are still on the Spanish mark 1 spec?
Or how about Red Bull bringing nearly twice as many upgrades since the summer break and doing that thing they do- you know- like develop the car
Well that is quite possible, but not with the kind of absolute domination it used to show in this kind of heat, that's my point.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:37This car would have won without the crash in the sprint.
Lando crashed in Canada, Oscar crashed in Baku.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 23:19Without the engine DNF and Canada crash/DNF Lando would be clear ahead.
Not true. Piastri's lead after Dutch GP was 104 points, 4 races later it's only 40. At this rate Max will be champion before Abu Dhabi.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑19 Oct 2025, 22:59Thing is even with how many bad performances they still haven't touched Piastri. The law of football says that if you are unable to score with all these chances you will recieve that goal in the end. Piastri won't be bad forever and that Red Bull won't be able to win every race.