2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
mzso
mzso
69
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

WardenOfTheNorth wrote:
08 Nov 2025, 07:13
I thought the whole idea of ground effect was that the floor generated most of the overall downforce??
It's weird that the dumbed down supposedly results in higher down-force.

mzso
mzso
69
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Ah, just look at the nice clean airflow of the top 2 cars. :)
Image

vorticism
vorticism
366
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

In lieu of having our own cars and wind tunnels, we are at the mercy of occasional published simulation work and word of mouth on these DF share percentages. 34% is the same figure mentioned previously in the RE article--maybe he was also involved in that sim. 33:33:33 is a reasonable assumption (front:mid:rear device DF share). We don’t know if the beam wings were counted as part of the floor or as part of the rear wing. We don’t know if the diffuser was counted as part of the rear aero generally, or as part the mid body aero. Note that while the floors in any era of these cars is the largest aero device by area, the front third of the ’22-type floors produce positive lift. While it may lose out on certain measurements of efficiency, a raked flat plane, generally speaking, produces negative lift across all of its surface.

Second guy on the internet expecting to see rake on these cars after yours truly, though I shall withhold judgement until I see the quality of his Colorful Freehand Drawings.