I hope this quote will return in Vegas
On the hards? Not a hope.SchuMassa wrote: ↑09 Nov 2025, 21:30A one-stopper was a no brainer at that point, I think he could have clung onto second.
Can't blame them, these tires make no sense. You go one weekend, the softs are amazing and you can do the whole race with them with zero deg. You go to the other, softs barely last 10 laps.
Honestly, not much you can do with tire strategy on a sprint weekend. Unless you play 3D chess and qualify P16
I think after Friday, they knew it is a medium tire race, therefore use the soft in the sprint. But the red flag there crossed there plan.
McLaren did the opposite, start the sprint on medium and switched to soft.
He also had fresh tyres to bolt on all the time.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑09 Nov 2025, 21:16Yeah, fully agreed. When you look at it objectively it was quite lucky.Macklaren wrote: ↑09 Nov 2025, 21:13I know the narrative tomorrow will be another "epic" drive from Max, but he got very lucky just like last year. Even the puncture perfectly took him off a terrible tire early in the race, under SC conditions. And he had new Mediums and Softs left.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑09 Nov 2025, 21:09The team must go into Las Vegas with the intention to win. Don't fall into a trap of defending this lead.
Just win, take it further away.
He misses out on Q2 by smallest of margins, forcing them to take new engine and setup that makes it the fastest car. With a slightly better qualifying he is probably P12 or P8 with a bad setup, no new engine and little chance to go forward.
This was a great masterful drive by him but it could have easily been much worse.
Stop being so desperate. Not even Russel was complaining. You make more posts to bitch about Max than to praise your favourite driver, Piastri. Be a little objective. The least you can accept is that Piastri has lost his mojo - despite driving the best car of 2025, he couldn't finish ahead of the guy starting from pitlane, in an inferior car that was put together in a usable setup window at the last minute.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑09 Nov 2025, 20:30Is it allowed to change directions more than two times to break DRS?
Oops my fault. Then they where actually somehow lucky, imagine they would have been without this tire.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑09 Nov 2025, 21:52McLaren did the opposite, start the sprint on medium and switched to soft.
That medium is probably the one they raced with today.
happy to eat my words. Redbull did get lucky the 2nd time and put their car in a good setup window.venkyhere wrote: ↑09 Nov 2025, 18:04Don't worry, last year the RB20 car was 'balanced' (after their 'fixes') , it lacked performance. This time, they are going blind and hoping on luck - they had one attempt to find the setup balance between sprint and Q, didn't get it. Now they have made a second attempt between Q and race. What are the chances they get it right a second time ? very little. Even if there is rain, which, to an extent bridges performance differences across teams (as the speeds will be lower), what is vital is 'balance' ; and RBR simply dont have it. They are basically shooting in the dark, hoping it sticks - that usually doesn't work in F1, especially in the ground effect ruleset (remember the 'experiments' phase that Mercedes underwent, from 2022 until late 2023 ?).
I am not a fan of any driver/team, a true 'neutral' just that I admire 'talent' (whether driving or whether engineering), and the reason I am disappointed is because the Monza resurgence gave a 'false hope' of a proper championship fight, but now, with Piastri and Max falling by the wayside, it's a one-man show. And Norris truly deserves it, make no mistake. Just that as a 'fan of the sport' it would have been so much better to see a 'fight'.