Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

what is it exactly a human body lacks with age making it impossible to compete on top level?
One could argue a racing car is a dbilating device to the driver and after a certain amount of working hours your body will just not cope anymore.I think that was the case with Gerhard Berger in his last two years with Benneton when he just could not ever get back to full health and fitness and he simply had to give up .
Still he won a race in his last season ...
I feel the real problem with age is you are not prepared to put that much effort into it ,but it is required to to be competitive.But this effect is not really bound to the physical age but more so to your will to win..some guys have it -see Schumacher and others lose it instantly after a single championship a lost race ,season or a contract not materialising .

Stradivarius
Stradivarius
1
Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 19:20

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

SectorOne wrote:
Stradivarius wrote:Where do you think the changes take place when a person adapts to new regulations? In his toe nails? Isn't it safe to assume that these changes take place in the brain? At least I can't think of any other place where this change would realistically take place. At the same time I doubt that such changes would be discovered in medical check ups to clear a driver for racing.
Definitely the brain. However my stance is that it´s simply getting to grips with new regs, your stance is that it´s an old brain that has gotten slower but is rebuilding itself because he´s racing more.
Your opinion is age, my is new regulations. I guess that is the main difference.

Not sure if you have noticed but you are sort of claiming that Schumacher´s brain is reversing it´s biology.
It´s old but it´s getting "newer" with more racing.
Actually, you haven't understood what I am saying. I am not claiming that Schumacher's brain is reversing its biology. I am claiming that Schumacher was driving better in 2012 than in 2010. I don't explain this with Schumacher's brain developing it's physical abilities. I explain it the same way as you do; that he has gained experience and gotten more to grips with the current formula. What separates my opinion from yours is that you don't consider this a change to the brain.

If you do a medical checkup, then go home and read a book you haven't already read before going back and do a new medical checkup, do you think the doctor will find that anything has changed? I don't think so. But having read the book, I know that something has changed in your brain. This book might have contained information that is useful to you, and could even have improved some of your abilities. But no doctor would find out about it through a medical checkup.

If you get bitten by a dog tomorrow, you may get some injuries and go to hospital and later be decleared fully recovered. But may still experience a change to the way you react when you see a dog in the future, or it may change the way you react when you are in the same area as where you got bitten. With time you may very well learn to cope with this without feeling more worried near dogs than before, but may still subconsciously do some thing different from before you got bitten. Maybe you will be more alert when you walk in the streets and maybe this will cause you to be more tired than you used to be. I don't think any medical checkup would identify this as a problem, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be there.

You could also compare it to hard drives. If you buy two identical harddrives today and start storing a lot of information on one of them, isn't this a change that makes the harddrives different afterwards? One is empty and one is filled with information. The one you filled with information has changed since you bought it. But you will need to use the harddrive in order to find out. At least it would be very hard for you to discover any difference by disassembling the harddrive and inspect it. I realize of course that it would be possible, as we know exactly how a harddrive works. But that is not the case with the brain, although we know that it is capable of storing information.

By the way, if you look at all types of sports or competitions that exist, you will find that those who win at the top level are generally relatively young. Even in competitions where experience is known to be a valuable factor. Isn't this enough to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the performance sooner or later drops with increasing age? When did we last see a world champion above 40 years in formula 1? What is the highest age of any world champion in formula 1 ever? Is it Fangio at age 46?

User avatar
SectorOne
166
Joined: 26 May 2013, 09:51

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

Stradivarius wrote:
SectorOne wrote:
Stradivarius wrote:Where do you think the changes take place when a person adapts to new regulations? In his toe nails? Isn't it safe to assume that these changes take place in the brain? At least I can't think of any other place where this change would realistically take place. At the same time I doubt that such changes would be discovered in medical check ups to clear a driver for racing.
Definitely the brain. However my stance is that it´s simply getting to grips with new regs, your stance is that it´s an old brain that has gotten slower but is rebuilding itself because he´s racing more.
Your opinion is age, my is new regulations. I guess that is the main difference.

Not sure if you have noticed but you are sort of claiming that Schumacher´s brain is reversing it´s biology.
It´s old but it´s getting "newer" with more racing.
Stradivarius wrote:Actually, you haven't understood what I am saying. I am not claiming that Schumacher's brain is reversing its biology. I am claiming that Schumacher was driving better in 2012 than in 2010. I don't explain this with Schumacher's brain developing it's physical abilities. I explain it the same way as you do; that he has gained experience and gotten more to grips with the current formula. What separates my opinion from yours is that you don't consider this a change to the brain.
Did you really read my post? The first three words contain "definitely the brain".

Stradivarius wrote:If you do a medical checkup, then go home and read a book you haven't already read before going back and do a new medical checkup, do you think the doctor will find that anything has changed? I don't think so. But having read the book, I know that something has changed in your brain. This book might have contained information that is useful to you, and could even have improved some of your abilities. But no doctor would find out about it through a medical checkup.
If you are talking strictly mental practice then a book might help but to think a book might help with physical damage (whether it´s age or a blow to the head is to be considered MAGIC, which do not exist in this universe)

Stradivarius wrote:If you get bitten by a dog tomorrow, you may get some injuries and go to hospital and later be decleared fully recovered. But may still experience a change to the way you react when you see a dog in the future, or it may change the way you react when you are in the same area as where you got bitten. With time you may very well learn to cope with this without feeling more worried near dogs than before, but may still subconsciously do some thing different from before you got bitten. Maybe you will be more alert when you walk in the streets and maybe this will cause you to be more tired than you used to be. I don't think any medical checkup would identify this as a problem, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be there.
Actually funny that you mention it but i have been bitten by a dog. (quite bad actually)
The effect of being more afraid or alert of dogs is purely MENTAL. It´s nothing physical other then your own mind.
For me, the opposite happened, i´m LESS afraid of dogs. I actually have more respect of dogs these days.

so if you talk about Massa´s post crash effects then it´s purely mental and has nothing to do with the actual crash itself.
In terms of physical damage. And if you agree with that, then i agree with you in saying it´s purely mental problems rather then physical.

Stradivarius wrote:You could also compare it to hard drives. If you buy two identical harddrives today and start storing a lot of information on one of them, isn't this a change that makes the harddrives different afterwards? One is empty and one is filled with information. The one you filled with information has changed since you bought it. But you will need to use the harddrive in order to find out. At least it would be very hard for you to discover any difference by disassembling the harddrive and inspect it. I realize of course that it would be possible, as we know exactly how a harddrive works. But that is not the case with the brain, although we know that it is capable of storing information.
We know quite a lot of the brain today actually, and it´s quite far from being a harddrive, it´s actually a lot more "beautiful then that" and much more complex.
It´s really not the ideal comparison as a hardrive and a brain is lightyears from each other in terms of pure technology.
Stradivarius wrote:By the way, if you look at all types of sports or competitions that exist, you will find that those who win at the top level are generally relatively young. Even in competitions where experience is known to be a valuable factor. Isn't this enough to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the performance sooner or later drops with increasing age? When did we last see a world champion above 40 years in formula 1? What is the highest age of any world champion in formula 1 ever? Is it Fangio at age 46?
No it´s not enough to prove anything i´m afraid, that´s not how science works.
Maybe it´s the physical body that is taking a beating. the physical body of an F1 driver needs to account for G forces on the neck.
Not run 200M as fast as you possibly can. F1 is different to all other regular sports in that sense.
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of sh*t"

Stradivarius
Stradivarius
1
Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 19:20

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

SectorOne wrote:so if you talk about Massa´s post crash effects then it´s purely mental and has nothing to do with the actual crash itself. In terms of physical damage. And if you agree with that, then i agree with you in saying it´s purely mental problems rather then physical.
I see no reason to comment everything else that you wrote, as here I think we have gotten to the bottom of what seemed to be a big disagreement. I do not claim (nor dismiss) that Massa has physical damage to his brain that hurts his performance. I simply state that his crash may be the reason why he seems to perform worse now than before the crash. Whether the reason is mental or something physical in his brain that for some reason doesn't disqualify him from racing, makes no difference with respect to that statement.
We know quite a lot of the brain today actually, and it´s quite far from being a harddrive, it´s actually a lot more "beautiful then that" and much more complex.
It´s really not the ideal comparison as a hardrive and a brain is lightyears from each other in terms of pure technology.
I was simply comparing a function that you find both in brains and in harddrives: The ability to store information/data. Experience and knowledge is very much comparable to data stored on a harddrive (not in every way, as the mechanisms used are different), and as long as I never made any further comparison beyond that, it's an excellent comparison for that specific purpose.
Stradivarius wrote:By the way, if you look at all types of sports or competitions that exist, you will find that those who win at the top level are generally relatively young. Even in competitions where experience is known to be a valuable factor. Isn't this enough to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the performance sooner or later drops with increasing age? When did we last see a world champion above 40 years in formula 1? What is the highest age of any world champion in formula 1 ever? Is it Fangio at age 46?
No it´s not enough to prove anything i´m afraid, that´s not how science works.
It's not a definite proof, but it still removes any reasonable doubt in my opinion. And actually, in many cases this is exactly how science works. I can't proove that you will be dead in 200 years, but I think any doubt of this statement is unreasonable. Science is often about observing trends and patterns and make theories based on the observations. The knowledge that we have about the placebo effect has been acquired that way.
Maybe it´s the physical body that is taking a beating. the physical body of an F1 driver needs to account for G forces on the neck.
Not run 200M as fast as you possibly can. F1 is different to all other regular sports in that sense.
Why do you say that F1 is different to all other regular sports?

I didn't say formula 1 was directly comparable to running 200 m or to any other competition in particular, I said that you can look at any sport or competition that exist and you will see that they are usually won by relatively young people. Some of the activities are physically very demanding. Some of them aren't. Formula 1 is quite physically demanding in some ways, but I suppose once the driver reaches a certain minimum of fitness, his performance is mainly determined by other factors. But it doesn't really matter what qualities are important because I am talking about all types of competitions on top level. It is a fact that competitions are generally won by young people, not only physically demanding competitions, but competitions in general.

The best football player in the world is 26 years old. The best tennis player in the world is 26 years old. The best alpine skier in the world is 24 years old. I could go on and look at the best ranked competitors in other sports as well, and maybe I would find some people above 30 years old. Maybe I would even find someone above 40 years old as well. But I think the pattern seems pretty clear. I won't find anyone above 80 years of age, or 70 years of age. I strongly doubt we will find anyone above 60 years of age as well. Maybe there are some above 50 years of age?

In formula 1 you can't look at the results and say with certainty who is best. Many people think Alonso is a better driver than Vettel, although Vettel is leading the championship and has won it the last 3 years. But you can still observe the age of f1 drivers and compare the age of those who win to the age of those who win other competitions. In that respect I can't see that F1 is different to all other regular sports.

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

Please can we agree on some simple facts*

  • Reactions, strength & stamina decline with age, while experience grows with age. Most dynamic sports reach their peak in the late 20's or early 30's. The common peak indicates to me an ageing process that is not specific to the sport.
  • Massa probably doesn't have detectable cognitive damage from his accident
  • Psychology & confidence have a large part to play in elite sports.
We don't know if Massa failing to match his team mate is due to age, lack of confidence, team dynamics, some very subtly cognitive damage from his accident, or his team mate has more talent. Probably a bit of everything.


* Mod speak for "Lets drop this and move on"[/i]

ChrisF1
ChrisF1
7
Joined: 28 Feb 2013, 21:48

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

Sorry Richard, there was just one thing I wanted to add which is about Schumacher.

I can't find a link for this, but after a severe brain injury I was informed that as the brain repeats an action, it creates a shortcut so that it will do this faster. Think of the moment that you feel the car lose grip for instance. After 4 years out, the brain may have created a new shortcut for something else you repeatedly do. After a year of driving in F1, the original reaction to the cars behaviour may return, therefore improving your response time.

Apply that as you will to the Schumacher case you have been discussing, I have no opinion on that either way but thought an additional bit of info may help ;)

As you were...

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

It's difficult to tell how precisely age affects reaction time of racing drivers. They are getting much more stimuli then your average person, so the degredation process should atleast be slower. Also depends how intensely they train it outside the cockpit. Alonso for instance trains that on specialised equipment (I believe something with hitting button when the corresponding light goes on).

It isn't also necessary true that a decrease in reaction time automatically enhances performancy. The reaction needs be below a certain point to act on unforeseen circumstances, but if you can already react in time you gain no advantage by reacting even faster.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
AnthonyG
38
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 13:16

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

Couldn't it just be that Massa isn't fast enough today because the tyres changed completly? I red an article on autosport a few years ago where they stated the hard sidewalled bridgestone tyres played a lot into his driving style. (had something to do with braking)
Thank you really doesn't really describe enough what I feel. - Vettel

Stradivarius
Stradivarius
1
Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 19:20

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

AnthonyG wrote:Couldn't it just be that Massa isn't fast enough today because the tyres changed completly? I red an article on autosport a few years ago where they stated the hard sidewalled bridgestone tyres played a lot into his driving style. (had something to do with braking)
That is possible. As I wrote earlier here, Massa's performance was pretty decent in 2010, while they still used the Bridgestone tyres, until the team order in Germany. The rest of that season may have been affected by lack of motivation after having to give away the win at Hockenheim, and then the tyres changed for 2011. It's definitely a plausible explaination in my opinion, whether or not the crash also plays a part.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

you may not really be aware of it ,but skills are not talent .
Skills and finesse are aquired by repetition something we now do not see as much as we did a few years ago when drivers could pound around tracks as long as their neck would be able to carry head +helmet.
I have no doubt at all that some of the recent examples of top line drivers have less raw talent on offer but aquired skills through very good training and mucho testing .
From that side I think reactions play a minor role only in racing.In fact i don´t think many drivers rely on reactions but much more on anticipation and instincts.
A very good reason why bad experiences cost lap time....you shy away from things hurting badly.

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

Good God Richard...It's time to lock it.
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

Gerhard Berger
Gerhard Berger
-1
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:17

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

Stradivarius wrote:
AnthonyG wrote:Couldn't it just be that Massa isn't fast enough today because the tyres changed completly? I red an article on autosport a few years ago where they stated the hard sidewalled bridgestone tyres played a lot into his driving style. (had something to do with braking)
That is possible. As I wrote earlier here, Massa's performance was pretty decent in 2010, while they still used the Bridgestone tyres, until the team order in Germany. The rest of that season may have been affected by lack of motivation after having to give away the win at Hockenheim, and then the tyres changed for 2011. It's definitely a plausible explaination in my opinion, whether or not the crash also plays a part.
Massa's performances after Hockenheim were still pretty good. A couple of podiums and a couple of fourth places. Certainly his performances post Hockenheim were no worse than his performances pre Hockenheim.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

I mentioned this as a theory - but Massa has always been one of the more prolific trail brakers. Trail braking requires strong tyres under compound loading - and in 2010 he duly was quick in quali, as he was on the 2013 tyres, which were more suited to compound loads than the 2011-2012 tyres. Perhaps the tyres are in fact the cause for his downturn?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

Stradivarius
Stradivarius
1
Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 19:20

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

Gerhard Berger wrote:Massa's performances after Hockenheim were still pretty good. A couple of podiums and a couple of fourth places. Certainly his performances post Hockenheim were no worse than his performances pre Hockenheim.
In the 11 races up to and including Hockenheim in 2010, Massa was good for 92 points (when including the 7 points he would have gotten without the team order). Alonso was good for 116 points in the same 11 races, when excluding the 7 points he got as a result of the team order. In the final 8 races, Massa scored 52 points, while Alonso scored 129 points.

Now, let's analyze these numbers: Massa went from scoring an average of 8.4 points per race to 6.5 points per race. Perhaps this drop of 1.9 points per race isn't a big difference, but in that case the difference between Massa and Alonso until Hockenheim also wasn't big, as Alonso scored 10.5 per race in average, which gives a difference of only 2.1 points per race, i.e. very similar. So if you say that Massa was as good after Hockenheim as before, you must also say that Massa was as good as Alonso until Hockenheim, as the point's difference was similar.

But let's look at what happened to Alonso. Until Hockenheim he scored 10.5 points per race in average. After Hockenheim he scored more than 16 points per race in average. So the difference between Alonso and Massa grew from 2.1 points per race to almost 10 points per race. So to me it is very clear that Massa's performance was indeed worse after Hockenheim than before. The car, however, performed better at the end of the season, so you don't see a big difference when looking at Massa's results alone. But when you compare to Alonso, it is clear that the difference grew dramatically.

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Felipe Massa - Robbed of his Prime?

Post

I'm sure I've read this before ..... *rummages in the archives* .....

Here it is ... :arrow: http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 80#p127780

Which brings me to the golden rule of moderating "What would Ciro do?"


.


.

ps - A couple of members have already asked for this to be closed.

pps - To paraphrase Jane Austen -
"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that people discussing divers must be in want of a good topic".

ppps - To paraphrase Einstein
"Two things are infinite: the universe and discussions about who is the fastest driver in F1, but about the universe I still have some doubts"