Hypercars

Breaking news, useful data or technical highlights or vehicles that are not meant to race. You can post commercial vehicle news or developments here.
Please post topics on racing variants in "other racing categories".
User avatar
Stu
Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2019, 10:05
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Hypercars

Post

Cold Fussion wrote:
16 Apr 2024, 07:59
OO7 wrote:
15 Apr 2024, 17:05
Stu wrote:
15 Apr 2024, 20:11
Just like the aborted Nissan LMP project?
Given time & development that could have mixed with the front-runners.
Wasn't the Nissan lmp1 car basically the same pace as lmp2 at Le Mans? I don't see why that would have ever been competitive.
It never ran in competition with the electrical system, which lead to all manner of operational compromises. There was a deep-dive a while ago in Racecar Engineering that added the numbers for the electrical system and included the dynamic changes that would result. The results might surprise you.
Perspective - Understanding that sometimes the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: Hypercars

Post

Cold Fussion wrote:
16 Apr 2024, 07:59
OO7 wrote:
15 Apr 2024, 17:05
It's a shame there aren't any modern, NA, V16 racing/sportscar engines out there, as I'd like to do a sound comparison with a V12. I'd expect a V16 (for a similar displacement and exhaust configuration) to have a higher pitch and sound like two flat plane V8s working in concert, but they typically (old versions) sound like higher pitched cross plane V8's. I'm guessing that's down to the exhaust manifold design/straight pipes.
The new Bugatti in development is using a Cosworth made V16 that revs to 9000 rpm, so you'll get your comparison in the next couple years.
In the video Bugatti released, the V16 sounded like two cross plane V8s to my ears.
Last edited by OO7 on 22 Apr 2024, 05:27, edited 1 time in total.

Cold Fussion
Cold Fussion
93
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 04:51

Re: Hypercars

Post

Stu wrote:
16 Apr 2024, 08:50
Cold Fussion wrote:
16 Apr 2024, 07:59
OO7 wrote:
15 Apr 2024, 17:05



Wasn't the Nissan lmp1 car basically the same pace as lmp2 at Le Mans? I don't see why that would have ever been competitive.
It never ran in competition with the electrical system, which lead to all manner of operational compromises. There was a deep-dive a while ago in Racecar Engineering that added the numbers for the electrical system and included the dynamic changes that would result. The results might surprise you.
Does it really amount to a 20s a lap pace deficit?

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: Hypercars

Post

Bugatti Tourbillon V16: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmNDpH1Ymsk

Fantastic to see a V16 without a centre power take off, so all the cylinders are equally spaced.

NoDivergence
NoDivergence
50
Joined: 02 Feb 2011, 01:52

Re: Hypercars

Post

Cold Fussion wrote:
20 Apr 2024, 17:07
Stu wrote:
16 Apr 2024, 08:50
Cold Fussion wrote:
16 Apr 2024, 07:59


It never ran in competition with the electrical system, which lead to all manner of operational compromises. There was a deep-dive a while ago in Racecar Engineering that added the numbers for the electrical system and included the dynamic changes that would result. The results might surprise you.
Does it really amount to a 20s a lap pace deficit?
Yes

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: Hypercars

Post

gruntguru wrote:
02 Mar 2024, 05:20
Low-revving turbo motor. It will never sound as good as the Cosworth V12 in the GMA T.50.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FwkZFJLtS0

Agree with Greg on the TV problem. PTO is at the end of the crank. This engine will never be able to rev like the T.50. Won' even be able to match the firing frequency I bet. (Would need 9,000 rpm to do that.)
9000 rpm is where it revs to.

gruntguru
gruntguru
564
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: Hypercars

Post

OO7 wrote:
26 Jun 2024, 12:12
gruntguru wrote:
02 Mar 2024, 05:20
Low-revving turbo motor. It will never sound as good as the Cosworth V12 in the GMA T.50.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FwkZFJLtS0

Agree with Greg on the TV problem. PTO is at the end of the crank. This engine will never be able to rev like the T.50. Won' even be able to match the firing frequency I bet. (Would need 9,000 rpm to do that.)
9000 rpm is where it revs to.
Thanks. So just able to match the firing frequency of the GMA T50.
je suis charlie

Cold Fussion
Cold Fussion
93
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 04:51

Re: Hypercars

Post