mwillems wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 22:00
AR3-GP wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 21:56
mwillems wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 21:49
That stuff is pretty serious deficiency in the team, whereas if Piastri was .1 a lap slower, Lando would have walked to the title.
This kind of statement belittles the depth and breadth of skill that is required to be a good Formula 1 driver. It's not just about pace. I can prove that by pointing you to the many races last year when Max Verstappen defeated Lando Norris despite being 1 tenth or more slower on the race track. I can also point you to the times that even Oscar Piastri defeated Lando Norris despite being slower (Hungary 2024, Monza 2024). So what does your statement really say? Lando's issue is often not pace (though it can be). His greater weaknesses are still lap 1/starts, little mistakes under pressure, and racecraft which is simply a very big hole that a more competent opponent can exploit even if you are faster. Being quick is not enough.
Dude, I don't think any if this changes the fact that he got a bit further than he or the car deserved on their own merit, sorry.
My statement says exactly what it says, Max benefitted from having two equally talented drivers taking points off each other and that it it is very small margins that would put one driver consistently in front. it is not small margins to do the same in the Red Bull, it'd be a miracle.
I think your statement is correct, but only in a limited context. Suppose teamA and teamB have two strong cars :
Q1 : When does
'two #1 drivers from teamB being equally strong' benefit the #1 driver from teamA ?
A1 : only when teamA has the faster car. The challengers from teamB will race with each other rather than him, and even if the teamA driver makes a driving/strategy mistake, he can still recover with pure pace and has a reasonable chance to finish P2, if not P1.
Q2 : When does
'two #1 drivers from teamB being equally strong' afflict the #1 driver from teamA ?
A2 : whenever teamB is the faster car. Then no matter how brilliantly the #1 driver from teamA drives/has better strategy, teamB has two cars to 'cover him', and if both teamB drivers drive mistake free, the guy has to settle for P3.
Now if you do the mapping teamA = Redbull and teamB = McLaren, we can see that it's mostly Q2-A2 scenario (and occasionally Q1-A1) that has panned out over the 2025 season. In fact, for most of the season McLaren has been faster car by a big margin and on the few tracks where the Redbull has been the faster car (Monza, AbuDhabi, for example) it's been faster only by a small margin, it has just 'matched' the Mclaren mostly, whenever the Redbull have not had a 'bad car'. So all the more reason to believe that it's been Q2-A2 scenario this season (and rarely Q1-A1). In fact, out of the three drivers, the guy who made the least mistakes is Max, and that's why he was able to gather so many podiums (even wins) whenever the Redbull has been the 2nd fastest car. Whenever the Redbull has been fastest, he has always won. So my humble conclusion is that Max hasn't benefitted because Mclaren have two #1 drivers, it's actually McLaren drivers who suffered from each other by taking P1 off each other, as both of them were driving equally well. It was only in LasVegas/Qatar, when they simply 'handed over' points to Max via big blunders.