I was thinking it could be interesting to collect suspicions, evidence and what not on this subject and see where it leads?
Nigel Mansell was always convinced that Lotus favored Elio de Angelis and Ferrari Alain Prost, true or not?
Alain Prost
"For '89, though, I was worried about Honda. And I think my biggest problem was that I never had the relationship with them that Ayrton did. From the beginning, it was something I never felt I had under control. I wouldn't have cared very much if they'd simply preferred one driver in the team - but the way they handled the situation was very difficult for me, because Senna and I had very different driving styles."
"I never understood why Honda took his side so much. It wasn't that I thought it was a question of the Brazilian sales marked or the French market, or anything like that. It was more a human thing. I worked with Honda again last year - now as a team owner - and it struck me again: I think the Japanese just work differently. In a team, they always favour someone over the rest. I've heard it said about their motorcycle teams as well."
"Let me give you an example. At one point in '88, the last year we were allowed to run turbos, I asked for some specific changes to the engine to suit my driving style and we worked on it for two days at Paul Ricard. At the end of that test I was very happy - but at the next race, one week later, they never put that strategy on my engine."
"Then we went to the French Grand Prix - at Ricard - and suddenly the engine was just as I had wanted! You understand what I'm saying? Ayrton and I raced for two seasons together in the McLaren-Hondas, and at both the French Grands Prix I was on pole position and won the race. Everyone said, 'Oh look, it's Prost in front of his home crowd', and that sort of thing. It was nothing like that; it was just that at those races I had something which enabled me to fight..."
"Understand me, this is nothing against Ayrton, OK? Ayrton was very quick, and in qualifying he was much better than me - much more committed, just as I think I was when I was the younger driver in the team, against Niki (Lauda)."
"Anyway, before the 1989 season I had dinner at the golf club in Geneva with Honda's then chairman, Mr Kawamoto and four other people. And he admitted that I was right in believing that Honda was more for Ayrton than for me."
"He said, 'You want to know why we push Senna so much? Well, I can't be 100 per cent sure.' But one thing he did let me know was that the new generation of engineers working on the engines were in favour of Ayrton, because he was more the samurai, and I was more the computer."
"So, that was an explanation, and I was very happy afterwards, because then at least I knew very well that something was not correct. Part of my problem had been that Ayrton was so bloody quick, it wasn't easy to know how much was that, and how much was Honda helping him. So after this dinner with Mr Kawamoto, I thought, 'Well, at least I'm not stupid - something really was going on, and now I know the situation.'"
Proving how silly all this is. If your favorite driver gets the newest parts, then they're 'development parts' and therefore the other driver is being favored. But if the team mate gets those parts, then they're 'the latest', and again is being favored.Raptor22 wrote:At Mercedes its clear Rosberg is the team favoured driver. He never gets a development part. Schumacher does.
Really? I know he was the number one during his Williams days (which he undoubtedly deserved against the rookie Hill) but Prost's autobiography is quite explicit about how Renault gave Rene Arnoux preferential treatment during his first stint working with the French marque.Raptor22 wrote:Prost was favoured at Renault
Its been a while since I read Hilton's autobiography on Prost so I may have it the wrong way round there. But I recall Arnoux being annoyed that Prost was the favoured son because he came from a more privileged background while Arnoux had to work his way around karting and F3 and into F1. The mechanics favoured Arnoux more because of this while management favoured Prost more because he was better spoken and good ambassador for the brand.gridwalker wrote:Really? I know he was the number one during his Williams days (which he undoubtedly deserved against the rookie Hill) but Prost's autobiography is quite explicit about how Renault gave Rene Arnoux preferential treatment during his first stint working with the French marque.Raptor22 wrote:Prost was favoured at Renault