marcush. wrote:you are saying they use tyres from diferent batch production for the same event?
I´d cry out loud if I were a victim of this...even though who knows how they verify that first and last of the productiuon run is THE same and variance from batch to batch is also at the border of detectable...and how do you quantify this...
i could imagine a lot of environmental influences will alter the behaviour and response of a race tyre- consistency over long periods of storage under uncontrolled conditions is surely not a priority in race tyre development ...

I was told years ago (from race tyre supply )that pirellis batch to batch variance is considerable in compound and carcass even measurable very easily with static springrate measurements and shore hardness sampling.
I don't think I'd care if I "fell victim" to this, to be honest. Don't think it matters one way or the other. If you have a good tire supplier with good manufacturing, batch to batch variation within several months or a season shouldn't be a big deal. If the manufacturer is crap, then the tires WITHIN a batch probably have some variation and you're hosed anyway.
Even then, some aspects of "variation" might be important, others are trivial. Not an efficient use of time to try and chase down all of them. Or worst case, burn through your older tires in practice and save your newer ones for Q and race.
Then there are some suppliers / series where you are intentionally not given build date information, because everyone would make such a damn fuss over finding tires a month newer than some other one or some malarkey like that. Good way to prevent people about worrying about things they shouldn't, and let them focus on bigger things.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.