JimClarkFan wrote:Lycoming wrote:Correlation does not imply causation.
Or more specifically, I don't see any good reason that suggests Button helps develop the car. Also during the last few Honda years, they were definitely not "in touch" of the title.
Yes, and I pretty much said all that above, and mentioned that the two being correlated makes it less likely to be incidental.
This year, we will see who is right, and we will all make up our mind on where we stand with button.
Button had to use Barichello's setup for many races, and he did the same from Hamilton at Mclaren. Heck Mclaren were out at sea trying to decide why Button couldn't get a handle on the car for 6 races this year. They had to go through his teammate's telemetry with a fine tooth comb to find out what he was doing wrong. If Button was the number 1 driver in 2012 it would be hard to rank the '27 as the fastest car. Not the hallmarks of a development driver if you asked me.
On the other hand, one could argue that getting the car to work for Button means you have found the best setup possible.
I don't believe that cars are designed around drivers, but for those who do, Paddy Lowe said that the '28 was designed with Hamilton in mind. Whatever that means I don't know how much of that was tailored towards Button's.
What I am expecting of the MP4-28 is a car that is should be capable of winning the WDC... but with tighter aero tests, tyres that are easier to heat up, restrained use of DRS in qualifying.. The cars are going to be more equal than ever and It's gonna be an outright dog-fight in qualifying and every 10th is going to mean making it into Q3 or not! I can't see a dominant car from any team. There are going to be 4 or 5 WDC capable cars, and those 3 tenths are what Button is going to need to bring Mclaren to the front.
I am predicting some wins for him despite that though. I can see him with two wins in 2013 with one for Checo.