Greg Locock wrote: ↑02 Apr 2017, 22:36(a) Surprisingly little,directly, and (b) no. I'd say they've pushed aero analysis forward but aero is fairly unimportant for road cars.
Aero is unimportant for road cars? Wow.Greg Locock wrote: ↑02 Apr 2017, 22:36(a) Surprisingly little,directly, and (b) no. I'd say they've pushed aero analysis forward but aero is fairly unimportant for road cars.
I didn't say that. I said fairly unimportant, so I struggle to assume good faith in your question. The difference that a good Cd makes in quoted mpg compared with a rubbish Cd is tiny. Go on, work it out (if you can).SR71 wrote: ↑06 Apr 2017, 04:00Aero is unimportant for road cars? Wow.Greg Locock wrote: ↑02 Apr 2017, 22:36(a) Surprisingly little,directly, and (b) no. I'd say they've pushed aero analysis forward but aero is fairly unimportant for road cars.
You know a Prius probably has more aero development than an F1 car right?
I doubt that very much. In road cars styling has an order of magnitude precedence over drag.
Hardly anything.
Never has been, never will be. It exists for entertainment, pure and simple.
I'd slightly disagree in that, commercially, the road relevance is extremely important to the OEMs involved. Given that motorsport is almost completely run on the advertising budgets of OEMs - if you take away the road relevence, a large portion of the sports bugets will walk away.Jersey Tom wrote: ↑06 Apr 2017, 13:20Never has been, never will be. It exists for entertainment, pure and simple.