It's not "mine", thanks anyway...
You speak, I obey, master:
I did some graphs based on the raw data I took (and corrected a little) from the incomparable Brian Lawrence that I posted here at :
viewtopic.php?t=3360.
The graphs I made were for analysis of track "performance", not engine performance. So, I did not tabulated the info on the cause of the failure (I believe Mr. Lawrence only distinguishes forced from unforced engine changes, but it is a beginning).
If somebody have the time (I don't, sorry) you can start at Usenet (on rec.autos.sport.f1, you can use
the portal Google Groups if you are not familiar with it), check for Brian posts (there are hundreds, since 1997 for each race) and go to his site. The post you'll find on the first page (summary of 2007 tests) it's not about engine failures, you'll have to seek it: look for posts on the dates of the last race in 2006 and check some post named something like "Engine failures".
I don't remember the name of the huge database Brian and his friends have, whose link I can't find right now with the initials of the four guys that keep it. This doesn't sound like a great help. As we say in Colombia (sorry, no offense intended), this "help" I'm giving it's "as useful as men nipples"...
Maybe some other day I'll find the time. After all, I've never seen a summary of F1 history for several years, containing the failures by brand or by engine, the data I gave for 2006 is sort of obvious. It shouldn't be hard given Mr. Lawrence carefully mantained statistics.
What really intrigues me is the info on accidents at F1 tracks, as you can imagine. I'd lease my soul to the devil for a while for that info, specially for data specifying
where along the track did the accidents happened. Actually, this kind of information is routinely taken for roads, I don't understand why it's not published for racing tracks, where accidents are common. I guess the drivers know, but it would be useful for me: I'd know at which curves I should close my eyes, waiting for the crash to happen...
