tomislavp4 wrote:I agree with M3_lover, it really made the race more interesting to watch and I don´t mind if they leave the rule unchanged
....., and more interesting race to watch
Would this point of view be persuaded in any way by the fact that BMW with the drive of N.Heidfield scored a 2nd place?
Anyways, the numerous SC periods and semi-new SC rules definately make for a Bingo Lottery result (as mentioned earlier by a fellow member). Even if the Canadian circuit differs a lot from Monaco, it still offers similar results, pretty much unpredictable. And as in Monaco, barriers in close proximity to the track make for a costly consequence to a simple error.
Max or who ever make these rules (SC) should most definately give a whirl to re-thinking them. But then again every one who would have made more money upon Hamilton winning has certainly done so, I would imagine Bernie is celebrating like never before with his new money/media source.
I guess there rules are meant to benefit a specific amount of people, obviously including Bernie, in some sort of way. Weeding out the top drivers and letting the race be a free for all for the mid-front runners. The multiple SC periods including the closed pit lane make for many drivers to take unwanted risks and recieve unecessary penalties, ex: Alonso, Massa, Rosberg, to mention a few (IIRC).
And who else could have won the race? As we may remember: Pole=Win.
The only exception to the rule this season being Sepang; Massa going from Pole to 5th place finish.
-------------------------
If I sound a bit bitter or resentful you may take a guess as to why, consider Ferrari's result this weekend one reason, and a winner who has had
everything in his motorsport career handed to him in a
silver platter the second reason, enough said for now.
