Of course you know I think ovals have their attractive, but, me aside, well, maybe the track is nothing special, but it has a
little history.
Over all, it's not the track, but the venue. For some of us, in America, it's like saying Monaco can be substituted by Cheste. Are you sure? I'm not.
It's like when you take your things out of the house. If "über-executives" like France and Ecclestone couldn't get along to make money,
the divorce is completed.
We (we, south americans) always thought that the jokes on the arrogance and the plainness were just that: jokes. Now it turned out that these were not jokes: they really think F1 in America is bad bussiness, in Ecclestone terms. Ecclestone, on his side, seems to imply that there is no market in USA. Funny, when you think NASCAR is the most attended sport in the world.
What can you answer now when americans say that F1 is focusing on the "high-yield" market? (I mean, focusing on the rich-guy-that-can-travel-to-the-other-end-of-the-world-without-giving-it-a-second-thought-because-he-has-a-sh*tload-of-money). Can BMW survive only based on the 7-series market?
It's a sad new.
Instead of pinnacle, F1 can contemplate now Twin Peaks. And you will always wonder which one is higher. Of course, some entrepreneur will think that Indy can be substituted and we will get some sort of caricature of what a GP has to be. What about a track in Oman or Muscate? They still have undeveloped land...
EDIT: Speed vs Liuzzi? Undecided, if you ask me.
Code: Select all
Career Comparison
Scott Speed Vitantonio Liuzzi
Races 27 31
Wins 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Poles 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Podiums 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Points 0 2
Retired 10 (37.04%) 11 (35.48%)
Head2Head Comparison
(27 Races) Scott Speed Vitantonio Liuzzi
Wins 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Poles 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Podiums 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Points 0 1
Retired 10 (37.04%) 9 (33.33%)
Finished Higher 11 12
Finished Higher when both
finished 6 6