http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/n ... 3137.shtml
If validated, that is great news as we are going back to more strategic tyre management.. almost back to early 90's rules..
If we could drop at the same time the two compound rule...
But they weren't both enforcedISLAMATRON wrote:wh? they had multiple compounds back then too
true, didnt they used to have 4 different compounds?Scotracer wrote:But they weren't both enforcedISLAMATRON wrote:wh? they had multiple compounds back then too
A,B,C and D with of course the fondly remembered qualifying tyre.ISLAMATRON wrote:true, didnt they used to have 4 different compounds?Scotracer wrote:But they weren't both enforcedISLAMATRON wrote:wh? they had multiple compounds back then too
I remember when I used to play Grand Prix, based in the 1991 season, maybe one of the first F1 simulators. The strategy that always payed was using D and make 2 or even 3 pitstops. I also used the A compound to make the game more interesting because the CC Cars where soooo slow!Agerasia wrote: A,B,C and D with of course the fondly remembered qualifying tyre.
surely to be fast at the start and maintain position right?Ian P. wrote:Someone correct me if I am wrong......happened once before, but it turned out I only thought I was wrong.
Isn't the push to eliminate refueling primarily a cost saving and safety measure..?? To avoid having to drag all the equipment, two refueling rigs for each team and extra people to every race.?? If they are forced to run without the strategy variations of fuel load, the only options are tyres.
My guess is that tyre management will become an enormous issue for the drivers with the teams likely wanting to go one with stop races.
The great news is that qualifying will now be real qualifying. None of this race fuel malarky.
Regardless, it will be a major shake-up in how the cars are built and how a team manages their strategy. Fast at the start or skew the car and settings to go fast at the finish. Should be extremely interesting.
Bridgstone, "Passion For Excellence" is not going to want to intentionally be bringing bad or even poor tyres to the races. The bad press will (and I am sure has already...) negate some of the publicity they get from F1.
Actually I think there is not much chance you will see much one stop racing as the very heavy start weights (min weight is to increase + all race fuel) will mean even greater tyre wear than this year. There haven't been too many succesful one stop strategies this year.Ian P. wrote:Someone correct me if I am wrong......happened once before, but it turned out I only thought I was wrong.
Isn't the push to eliminate refueling primarily a cost saving and safety measure..?? To avoid having to drag all the equipment, two refueling rigs for each team and extra people to every race.?? If they are forced to run without the strategy variations of fuel load, the only options are tyres.
My guess is that tyre management will become an enormous issue for the drivers with the teams likely wanting to go one with stop races.
The great news is that qualifying will now be real qualifying. None of this race fuel malarky.
Regardless, it will be a major shake-up in how the cars are built and how a team manages their strategy. Fast at the start or skew the car and settings to go fast at the finish. Should be extremely interesting.
Bridgstone, "Passion For Excellence" is not going to want to intentionally be bringing bad or even poor tyres to the races. The bad press will (and I am sure has already...) negate some of the publicity they get from F1.
that is not yet confirmed... i think the teams and most of the drivers want them to stay... i hop they get rid of emWhiteBlue wrote:Tyre warmers are banned.
I'm not sure about the benefits therein.ISLAMATRON wrote:They should keep the 2 different compounds, but drop the mandatory rule to run both.... BUT... they should have to start the race on whatever type of tire they qualify on.... that would be some serious strategy