Monstrobolaxa wrote:doc wrote:In dry conditions, i don't think Honda engine alone was going to win the race...
Well F1 Racing magazine is speculating that Honda might have more power then the Ferrari engine....though I really don't agree with them! To me Honda is 3rd on the power scale!
IMHO F1 Racing is wrong, for example look at the article from Autosport quoted by F1racing.net. The UK magazine affirms Honda RAE is the most powerful, but then why does kiuchi say "the next season Honda will be the number one" and doesn't he add "again"? My answer is that he doesn't think to have the best engine this year. IMHO it's only Autosport's supposition.
However it's relatively important, Honda is fighting for the second place while Ferrari and BMW are fully concentrated on 2005 project for some time, therefore they have been able to arrive at the power level of Ferrari, with the big difference that they aren't so sure to have solved the reliability problems (one of Suzuka specs blew off on Davidson's car at the recent jerez test) and they have been lucky with the weather at Suzuka, the engines will have much less mileage... i have no doubt that in the same conditions, with all these three manufacturers fighting for the championship, Ferrari and also BMW would have had no problem to put on the ground those few bhp to remain ahead of Honda.
Then does Kiuchi know what Italians and Germans are doing for 2005, if they are developing engines well over the 1000 barrier?
Nothing against the Japanese team, but i see a bit of arrogance in their words...
Unfortunately for them, Monza's results have been too clear...