McLaren MCL36

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
AeroDynamic
349
Joined: 28 Sep 2021, 12:25
Location: La règle du jeu

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post


User avatar
west52keep64
51
Joined: 16 Sep 2021, 00:05

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

There's defo differences on the car they had on stage. The floor tunnels appear to transition smoothly towards the edge of the floor. I wonder if they are using the full width of the floor for the tunnels some how? That could be a massive advantage if they've found a way to do that within the rules...

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

The rear suspension is multilink, not double wishbone.
Interesting.

SmallSoldier
SmallSoldier
479
Joined: 10 Mar 2019, 03:54

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Fer.Fan wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:49
f1rules wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:42
are they using the frontsidepods curvature and lack of undercut to guide air to seal the sides of the floor?
Definitly they follow a more 21 design path then AM that tried a completely new concept for these new rules

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLVwqMIWQAQ ... name=large
Lack of undercat, lack of inovations, I had muck higher expectations. Basic car, 2021 design.
The lack of an undercut isn’t necessarily a bad thing, they are using that in order to drive airflow away from the floor… I would argue that is more innovative than using an undercut as usual.

The nose is really thin, a lot of work there to pass a crash with that.

It’s also a very early version of the car, with most of the key parts hidden until testing and with more parts coming to the first race.

User avatar
AeroDynamic
349
Joined: 28 Sep 2021, 12:25
Location: La règle du jeu

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

west52keep64 wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:52
There's defo differences on the car they had on stage. The floor tunnels appear to transition smoothly towards the edge of the floor. I wonder if they are using the full width of the floor for the tunnels some how? That could be a massive advantage if they've found a way to do that within the rules...
Yeah that's what I was noticing as well but I couldn't tell if it just looked that way based on the outwash design of the side pods, we need a comparison.

Does lack of undercut / outwash design on side pods make the low pressure air under the floor work 'faster'? this isn't my area
Last edited by AeroDynamic on 11 Feb 2022, 21:55, edited 1 time in total.

Emag
Emag
84
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Fer.Fan wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:49
f1rules wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:42
are they using the frontsidepods curvature and lack of undercut to guide air to seal the sides of the floor?
Definitly they follow a more 21 design path then AM that tried a completely new concept for these new rules

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLVwqMIWQAQ ... name=large
Lack of undercat, lack of inovations, I had muck higher expectations. Basic car, 2021 design.
Dude, they have literally invented a new rear suspension layout. And this is shown on a car which James Key admitted to being intentionally simplified to hide things.

User avatar
Xero
32
Joined: 28 Jan 2014, 15:11
Location: Moray, Scotland

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

The sidepods do look very straight from front on, but it's an illusion to how narrow the sidepods really are. Undercut at the front creating outwash tapers to a strong downwash at the back. Tonnes of floor space on show as a result. It looks good.

3 cars shown, and 3 different looks. All worries about design freedom certainly haven't came true!
Last edited by Xero on 11 Feb 2022, 21:55, edited 1 time in total.

Hoffman900
Hoffman900
211
Joined: 13 Oct 2019, 03:02

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

I suspect this will be closer to the Mercedes than the Aston Martin to the Mercedes.

Based on nothing but a hunch.

f1rules
f1rules
597
Joined: 11 Jan 2004, 15:34
Location: Denmark

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

actually scarbs just posted something similar, it seems frontsidepod curvature outwards mimicks bargeboards and is probably to help seal the floor
Fer.Fan wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:49
f1rules wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:42
are they using the frontsidepods curvature and lack of undercut to guide air to seal the sides of the floor?
Definitly they follow a more 21 design path then AM that tried a completely new concept for these new rules

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLVwqMIWQAQ ... name=large
Lack of undercat, lack of inovations, I had muck higher expectations. Basic car, 2021 design.

SmallSoldier
SmallSoldier
479
Joined: 10 Mar 2019, 03:54

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Xero wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:54
The sidepods do look very straight from front on, but it's an illusion to how narrow the sidepods really are. Undercut at the front creating outwash tapers to a strong downwash at the back. Tonnes of floor space on show as a result. It looks good.

3 cars shown, and 3 different looks. All worries about design freedom certainly haven't came true!
And we still have the big 3 to show what they came up with… I’m with you, most of my worries about the individuality of the teams are dissipating

User avatar
west52keep64
51
Joined: 16 Sep 2021, 00:05

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

AeroDynamic wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:54
west52keep64 wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:52
There's defo differences on the car they had on stage. The floor tunnels appear to transition smoothly towards the edge of the floor. I wonder if they are using the full width of the floor for the tunnels some how? That could be a massive advantage if they've found a way to do that within the rules...
Yeah that's what I was noticing as well but I couldn't tell if it just looked that way based on the outwash design of the side pods, we need a comparison.

Does lack of undercut / outwash design on side pods make the low pressure air under the floor work 'faster'? this isn't my area
If they can seal the edge of the floor, they might be using the entire width as a venturi tunnel... that could be game changing.

SmallSoldier
SmallSoldier
479
Joined: 10 Mar 2019, 03:54

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

If this is the brake duct… That’s ridiculously small!

Image

billamend
billamend
15
Joined: 02 Sep 2019, 22:45

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Image

BlueCheetah66
BlueCheetah66
33
Joined: 13 Jul 2021, 20:23

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

Interesting that there is no shots from the rear. Maybe they have found a loophole in that area

Hoffman900
Hoffman900
211
Joined: 13 Oct 2019, 03:02

Re: McLaren MCL36

Post

SmallSoldier wrote:
11 Feb 2022, 21:58
If this is the brake duct… That’s ridiculously small!

https://i.imgur.com/VL1X9Bp.jpg
It most definitely isn’t.