Doesn't the Mercedes also have sidepods relatively far back?
Doesn't the Mercedes also have sidepods relatively far back?
So did everyone else?
It's an unusual choice but the 'proof of the pudding' will be on the race track. Pat Fry generally designs very good cars IMO, and this will be the first truly new Alpine for quite some time (since the RS19) won't it?
A lot of teams are running that outer strake quite far in, well inside the legality box. Whereas Alpine seem to be using it more as intended by the FOM car, so we'll see how that works.
It's possible that if you know there is an exhaust tuning penalty for merging the turbine exit and the wastegate, then it doesn't matter where you merge so you might as well reduce the mass of the pipework by merging the WG early.JPBD1990 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2022, 14:26They mean that Renault, Mercedes’ and Honda all hid the waste gate pipe inside the main exhaust much earlier along the piping, where Ferrari just spat it out (presumably) at the very limit where the rules stipulate it has to be one pipe onlybucker wrote: ↑22 Feb 2022, 13:43It's mandatory.ojir19 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2022, 13:22curious, as why Renault choose to "hide" the wastegate pipe (and probably other teams too)
https://i.imgur.com/92P9p4d.png
HAAS & Ferrari :
https://i.imgur.com/GjxKi7n.png
Motorsport.com said that the A522's wheelbase was shorter than everyone else, less than the max was the term they used, and where likely at the minimum weight. The other teams will probably struggle to get there. Not sure how they know that.Blackout wrote: ↑22 Feb 2022, 23:56So every team on the grid, except Alpine, has decided to pull the sidepods far forward and use them as bargeboards, except Alpine who said "I dont need that, and I'll keep normal sidepods. The tunnel entries can suck air and manage dirty wake alone."
https://i.imgur.com/gf3pRlv.jpg
A different cooling/combustion ratio between the Alpine and Mercedes rollhoop intake : )
God I hope she’s powerful.. seems as though the engine is what the team are banking on…. The rest of the car looks conservative.. let’s hope it’s quick out there box today..SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 09:17Split Turbo pics on the Alpine:
https://i.imgur.com/N1fkZMq.jpg
can't really make out any turbo parts on this picture, the one thing with the cilinder-shape part sticking out looks like a turbo housing, but would be in the wrong direction i recon...SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 09:17Split Turbo pics on the Alpine:
https://i.imgur.com/N1fkZMq.jpg
Too early to tell which team is “conservative” since they are showing their early iterations at this stage… Alpine definitely is going with their own concept for 2022.PowerandtheGlory wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 09:21God I hope she’s powerful.. seems as though the engine is what the team are banking on…. The rest of the car looks conservative.. let’s hope it’s quick out there box today..SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 09:17Split Turbo pics on the Alpine:
https://i.imgur.com/N1fkZMq.jpg
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
That point we discussed last year with the a bit strange F1 rules in this regard. Usually there should be a sort of BOP between non split turbo and the split turbo as from the point of concept there is a 10% gain in turbo efficiency.PowerandtheGlory wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 09:21God I hope she’s powerful.. seems as though the engine is what the team are banking on…. The rest of the car looks conservative.. let’s hope it’s quick out there box today..SmallSoldier wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 09:17Split Turbo pics on the Alpine:
https://i.imgur.com/N1fkZMq.jpg
If Alpine did extend forward it could have that much of an aggressive undercut.. seems the sidepod the most ready to adapt that designBlackout wrote: ↑23 Feb 2022, 10:12Actually the RB seems to have a sismilar sidepod design, only that its sidepod inlets gave been extended forward. (so a big front undercut, no side undercut, wide cocke bottle, downwashy top)
Alpine can extend its inlets like this too.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FMRDIZ1XEAI ... me=900x900