You mean strange because they differ in height? This is an anti-dive geometry. When breaking the car does not "dive". Ferrari also has an anti-dive front suspension, but less anti-dive.
In general, after seeing the Red Bull, i dare to say that Mercedes and Williams screwed up with their new cars. Most teams went for long sidepods. It seems to be more important to keep the front tyre wake away from the rear of the car and also feed the beam wing. Mercedes and Williams obviously have not noticed that, but i cannot imagine that all the other teams are wrong...another why i dare to say this is that F1s two most sucessfull minds - Adrian Newey and Rory Byrne both opted for long sidepods. I know Rory Byrne did not design the F1-75, he only is an adviser since 2007 and the F2004 the last car he was responsible for. But for the first time, even only as an adviser, he was actually involved in the design of a car again, not only making an existing design faster(what was his advisory role since 2007). And maybe its just me, but i think you can see Rory Byrnes Signature everywhere on the F1. Front Suspension, Front-Wing, Beamwing, Airbox and of course the sidepods, which obviously have a similar purpose like the ones he introduced on the B195 and F399 and were copied by McLaren in 2011....