Dont even think Max does have any body piercings.
Still wonders me why no action has been taken against a nose stud being worn. Selective application of the rules.
Dont even think Max does have any body piercings.
Their wing was the same as in Bahrain. They didn’t use the diffuser. It was just a test in FP1 only on Leclerc’s car.Mchamilton wrote: ↑09 Apr 2022, 11:20Ferrari brought a new diffuser to Aus, so perhaps they now have more rear DF from the floor so they can use a slimmer wing for the same over DF with less dragArtur Craft wrote: ↑09 Apr 2022, 10:52Let´s be honest, he should have been a lot closer, at least. He just couldn´t a lap together.
@dialtone if RB and FER have the same top speed now(well RB still have 4 or 5 km/h at the 310 ish places), what do you think happened? Have RB increased their DF/drag or has Ferrari decreased their DF/drag?He may very well be. If I had to guess so, I would pick him eventhough I don´t particularly support him
@xaero , no need to mock Alonso this time around. He likely isn´t among the fastests right now, also due to his age, but he was doing a very good job up untill his car fail
Obviously you have to take radio communications into consideration. If Stroll and Latifi both were given instructions that people behind were quicker, Stroll naturally would go towards the right side to leave room on the racing line. Should he look in his mirrors? Yes. Was Latifi slightly erratic in his driving? Yes. He almost came to a complete stop, and almost collided into Stroll before the incident happen. So I gave Latifi slightly more blame GIVEN(!) that Stroll had intentions of letting faster cars go by. BUT, by the looks of it, that wasn't the case, hearing from him in the interviews. So in that case I would say Stroll is the one that caused the incident, since he had no intentions to let other people go by, so he didn't have to go to the right side and thus doesn't have that excuse.JordanMugen wrote: ↑09 Apr 2022, 09:47It cannot possibly be Latifi's fault. Stroll drove straight into Latifi. It's 100% Stroll's fault.LHamilton wrote: ↑09 Apr 2022, 08:32To fully understand that incident you'll need the radio communication from the teams. Because it looked like both Latifi and Stroll was trying to let faster guys through, but at different stages. If you were to ask me who's fault it is, I would put it slightly on Latifi.
Radio communications do not overrule basic courtesy and duty to avoid a collision, especially on an out-lap!
Great lap from Charles, I think when it comes to extracting peak performance from the new cars, he is the top, whereas MV visibly struggles. Although, that's better than yesterday, this is a lot of porpoising still.Sevach wrote: ↑09 Apr 2022, 12:44https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkOIdLp ... l=FORMULA1
Still porpoising in the run to turn 9 but a lot less than yesterday, car loses some speed there and i think he lifts slightly earlier than he would in a perfectly flat car for T9.
Ferrari is probably counting on the lesser deployment and by consequence lower speeds to keep the car from bouncing on sunday.
Latifi was told to let Stroll go by, as he was starting a hot lap. He aborted it though, and Williams didn't realize, leaving Latifi dangling around the course waiting for a car to pass.LHamilton wrote: ↑09 Apr 2022, 12:11Obviously you have to take radio communications into consideration. If Stroll and Latifi both were given instructions that people behind were quicker, Stroll naturally would go towards the right side to leave room on the racing line. Should he look in his mirrors? Yes. Was Latifi slightly erratic in his driving? Yes. He almost came to a complete stop, and almost collided into Stroll before the incident happen. So I gave Latifi slightly more blame GIVEN(!) that Stroll had intentions of letting faster cars go by. BUT, by the looks of it, that wasn't the case, hearing from him in the interviews. So in that case I would say Stroll is the one that caused the incident, since he had no intentions to let other people go by, so he didn't have to go to the right side and thus doesn't have that excuse.
Reprimand at most probably.