All compounded by losing Otmar, who seemed to be the guy holding the whole thing together
All compounded by losing Otmar, who seemed to be the guy holding the whole thing together
WEll, not sure you can put this squarely on the lack of Otmar, although I like him and happy he is at Alpine. Think thier biggest problem is they have 2 lousy drivers. A team can live with 1 lousy driver but 2 ?
Is there anything to salvage from this season? There is no point in bringing upgrade to this design philosophy.Gap to mid-field is too large to cover with this car.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Apr 2022, 14:45WEll, not sure you can put this squarely on the lack of Otmar, although I like him and happy he is at Alpine. Think thier biggest problem is they have 2 lousy drivers. A team can live with 1 lousy driver but 2 ?
But I agree AMR should never have taken the reins out of OtMar's hands. I bet he had nothing to do with hiring Vettel and letting Perez go.
If you look at Alpine, they basicaly built a good car without a team principle. Otmar didn't start till around the first preseason test.
Maybe they'll get purchased buy VW.NAPI10 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2022, 19:55Is there anything to salvage from this season? There is no point in bringing upgrade to this design philosophy.Gap to mid-field is too large to cover with this car.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Apr 2022, 14:45WEll, not sure you can put this squarely on the lack of Otmar, although I like him and happy he is at Alpine. Think thier biggest problem is they have 2 lousy drivers. A team can live with 1 lousy driver but 2 ?
But I agree AMR should never have taken the reins out of OtMar's hands. I bet he had nothing to do with hiring Vettel and letting Perez go.
If you look at Alpine, they basicaly built a good car without a team principle. Otmar didn't start till around the first preseason test.
Next year is going to be 'Make or Break' year for AM. If the team doesn't take step forward(at least top of Mid-field); Lawrence will go into 'Sell/Exit' mode.
Yep, he needs to be more of a "I'll get you want you tell me you need guy".NL_Fer wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 07:30I feel Lawrence Stroll brought in allot of money, but also killed the efficiency of this team. They built several top 10 cars, with a minimal budget. But now hardly reach midfield with a midfield budget. And now Otmar also hinted at Stroll sr wants to much hands on influence on the team.
That would be the best scenario for the long-haul because it would allow Aston Martin, both in racing and production vehicles, to get away from Mercedes engines.
Not to get sidetracked, but I'm pretty sure the Renault works team failed to beat its customers in 2009-11 (Red Bull) and 2016-2020 (Red Bull, then McLaren).prendrefeu wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 19:28That would be the best scenario for the long-haul because it would allow Aston Martin, both in racing and production vehicles, to get away from Mercedes engines.
The best scenario is for each team to produce its own engines (most teams representing a production marque, exceptions of RedBull/Alpha Tauri). Why? The trend of a team using a purchased-engine performing worse than the team with their own engine is not a coincidence, and I'd like someone to point me to a year in which a team with a purchased PU performed better than the team with their own marque's PU.
Andy Green should not be part of F1 car design anymorecontinuum16 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 20:47Not to get sidetracked, but I'm pretty sure the Renault works team failed to beat its customers in 2009-11 (Red Bull) and 2016-2020 (Red Bull, then McLaren).prendrefeu wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 19:28That would be the best scenario for the long-haul because it would allow Aston Martin, both in racing and production vehicles, to get away from Mercedes engines.
The best scenario is for each team to produce its own engines (most teams representing a production marque, exceptions of RedBull/Alpha Tauri). Why? The trend of a team using a purchased-engine performing worse than the team with their own engine is not a coincidence, and I'd like someone to point me to a year in which a team with a purchased PU performed better than the team with their own marque's PU.
The question for Audi/VW is rather they'd have AM or Sauber I think; AM would come with a brand new factory, but marketing as Aston Martin-Audi seems convoluted (although obviously right now it's AM-Merc). I think Sauber would be more receptive to an outright takeover, which seems to be the preferred route from Audi. The team seems to be at a fork in the road, pushing and pulling in a lot of directions. For the sake of the people there I hope they improve enough this year to save face, because I fear Andy Green will be sitting quite uncomfortably for the next few months.
At the rate they're going, you're probably right and he won't be for much longer. The 'old guard' is slowly being shuffled out the door. First Perez, then Otmar, surely Green will be next; Fallows is clearly going to be heading this up. Also the last competitive car they "designed from scratch" was probably 2017/18, so it's been 5 years since he's produced something good.NAPI10 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 21:28Andy Green should not be part of F1 car design anymorecontinuum16 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 20:47Not to get sidetracked, but I'm pretty sure the Renault works team failed to beat its customers in 2009-11 (Red Bull) and 2016-2020 (Red Bull, then McLaren).prendrefeu wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 19:28
That would be the best scenario for the long-haul because it would allow Aston Martin, both in racing and production vehicles, to get away from Mercedes engines.
The best scenario is for each team to produce its own engines (most teams representing a production marque, exceptions of RedBull/Alpha Tauri). Why? The trend of a team using a purchased-engine performing worse than the team with their own engine is not a coincidence, and I'd like someone to point me to a year in which a team with a purchased PU performed better than the team with their own marque's PU.
The question for Audi/VW is rather they'd have AM or Sauber I think; AM would come with a brand new factory, but marketing as Aston Martin-Audi seems convoluted (although obviously right now it's AM-Merc). I think Sauber would be more receptive to an outright takeover, which seems to be the preferred route from Audi. The team seems to be at a fork in the road, pushing and pulling in a lot of directions. For the sake of the people there I hope they improve enough this year to save face, because I fear Andy Green will be sitting quite uncomfortably for the next few months.
Like to see you proove that was the PU doing doing and not the $$$ the top team had over everyone else.prendrefeu wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 19:28That would be the best scenario for the long-haul because it would allow Aston Martin, both in racing and production vehicles, to get away from Mercedes engines.
The best scenario is for each team to produce its own engines (most teams representing a production marque, exceptions of RedBull/Alpha Tauri). Why? The trend of a team using a purchased-engine performing worse than the team with their own engine is not a coincidence, and I'd like someone to point me to a year in which a team with a purchased PU performed better than the team with their own marque's PU.
As of 2022 Green was promoted to Chief Technical Officer as part of a reshuffle with Dan Fallows to take his place as technical director.NAPI10 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 21:28Andy Green should not be part of F1 car design anymorecontinuum16 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 20:47Not to get sidetracked, but I'm pretty sure the Renault works team failed to beat its customers in 2009-11 (Red Bull) and 2016-2020 (Red Bull, then McLaren).prendrefeu wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 19:28
That would be the best scenario for the long-haul because it would allow Aston Martin, both in racing and production vehicles, to get away from Mercedes engines.
The best scenario is for each team to produce its own engines (most teams representing a production marque, exceptions of RedBull/Alpha Tauri). Why? The trend of a team using a purchased-engine performing worse than the team with their own engine is not a coincidence, and I'd like someone to point me to a year in which a team with a purchased PU performed better than the team with their own marque's PU.
The question for Audi/VW is rather they'd have AM or Sauber I think; AM would come with a brand new factory, but marketing as Aston Martin-Audi seems convoluted (although obviously right now it's AM-Merc). I think Sauber would be more receptive to an outright takeover, which seems to be the preferred route from Audi. The team seems to be at a fork in the road, pushing and pulling in a lot of directions. For the sake of the people there I hope they improve enough this year to save face, because I fear Andy Green will be sitting quite uncomfortably for the next few months.
This is exactly how I thought the team should of been handled, New regulations + budget cap played right into the "old" teams hands and gave the team the opportunity to become a front runner but ever since Lawrence stroll and the pink merc the team has taken a step back every yeardiffuser wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 12:39Yep, he needs to be more of a "I'll get you want you tell me you need guy".NL_Fer wrote: ↑13 Apr 2022, 07:30I feel Lawrence Stroll brought in allot of money, but also killed the efficiency of this team. They built several top 10 cars, with a minimal budget. But now hardly reach midfield with a midfield budget. And now Otmar also hinted at Stroll sr wants to much hands on influence on the team.
Fallows hasn't arrived yet. Isn't he do in April?
Be a few months before his impact will start to be felt. On the track even longer.