This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
Difficult to judge where RB stands pacewise. Seems that they suffer in low speed traction. But we'll see, normally VER is really good in changing conditions.
Difficult to judge where RB stands pacewise. Seems that they suffer in low speed traction. But we'll see, normally VER is really good in changing conditions.
Horner said that they did better race pace settings for the car based on simulation data. It is logical when I think Ferrari's one lap advantage, sprint race. Race is always important.
Difficult to judge where RB stands pacewise. Seems that they suffer in low speed traction. But we'll see, normally VER is really good in changing conditions.
Looking at the gap to Perez he is..
Tbh Perez was on much better laps but got screwed by all the red flags. Sprint will be dry so let's see how it plays out.
Straight line speed was the same between Ferrari and RedBull maybe 1-2kmh, they have impressive braking into Tamburello and a decent enough S2, Leclerc could never really get close to them in S1 whole weekend long, and in the race you could see from Leclerc's onboard, that he just couldn't brake as late as Perez did. If Ferrari doesn't solve porpoising it's going to really hurt, especially in these sprint weekends where they have no time to adjust that stuff.
Looks like the setup of the RB was near perfect out-of-the-box. Really well executed weekend with 52 point for the team. I think that's an all time high in one weekend for a team.
This way they are very soon back in the mix for WDC. WCC is already really close.