Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
wuzak
wuzak
467
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

aleks_ader wrote:
02 Feb 2023, 02:27
-biggest shark fins as legally possible
The rules specify the size of the bodywork in that area.

If they didn't have a shark fin the engine cover would have to come up to that line.

So having a bigger shark fin means they have a smaller engine cover.

matteosc
matteosc
30
Joined: 11 Sep 2012, 17:07

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

gordonthegun wrote:
03 Feb 2023, 00:21
Goblin42 wrote:
02 Feb 2023, 20:36
as Vanja said perspective is a factor

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fn-remsXgAI ... =4096x4096
Perspective changes the height of the fin, but (maybe) not the angle formed by the edge of the fin with the profile of the engine cover.
In the photo, that angle is wider than any other on the F1-75 in the same context.

Anyway, the photo might be a fake, so let's not consider it too seriously.

https://i0.wp.com/f1ingenerale.com/wp-c ... errari.jpg
Perspective and lent distortion will modify both...
As you said, not much to take from here, but the photo is interesting, thank you for posting it!

Polite
Polite
18
Joined: 30 Oct 2018, 10:36

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post



fire up

User avatar
deadhead
52
Joined: 08 Apr 2022, 20:24

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

lovely purr

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

Polite wrote:
03 Feb 2023, 17:46


fire up
How important is a fire up, when technically there is barely any room for engine development?
Maybe just systems itegration, but no team should be that surprised of an old PU fire up.
For Sure!!

User avatar
organic
1055
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

ringo wrote:
04 Feb 2023, 17:56
Polite wrote:
03 Feb 2023, 17:46


fire up
How important is a fire up, when technically there is barely any room for engine development?
Maybe just systems itegration, but no team should be that surprised of an old PU fire up.
For Ferrari they have a lot of scope to improve engine-wise over last year. But I agree. Start-ups are just promotion of course

GoranF1
GoranF1
155
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 12:53
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

When we talk about Ferrari in preseason rumors, we should always be aware of a possibility, that Ferrari migth reintroduce a slightly tilted Engine.

Older members will know... 😆
"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication & competence."

User avatar
RicerDude
27
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 20:21

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

ringo wrote:
04 Feb 2023, 17:56
Polite wrote:
03 Feb 2023, 17:46


fire up
How important is a fire up, when technically there is barely any room for engine development?
Maybe just systems itegration, but no team should be that surprised of an old PU fire up.
For Ferrari they have a lot of scope to improve engine-wise over last year. But I agree. Start-ups are just promotion of course
[/quote]

Slightly missing the point of these clips.
Teams will of course get excited about any F1 cars first fire up for a season, regardless of if it’s a brand new engine for new regs.
First fire ups mark a significant milestone in any new race car build.
And no, the engineers wont be surprised that their new engine fires up. These audio clips are usually marking the point that the new engine is installed onto the chassis and it works independently from the bench systems in the rig room.

User avatar
organic
1055
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

https://www.formu1a.uno/ferrari-ecco-qu ... elaio-675/
According to reports, the new Ferrari chassis is 2/3 kg lighter than that of the F1-75 . Weight loss which is equivalent to 1 tenth.
Worth a read for sure.

User avatar
chrisc90
41
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

Mess with the Bull - you get the horns.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

They are sticking to tradition - no continuity with naming :mrgreen:
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

tpe
tpe
-4
Joined: 03 Feb 2006, 00:24
Location: Greece

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
07 Feb 2023, 13:29
They are sticking to tradition - no continuity with naming :mrgreen:
Unlike F2000-F2008

User avatar
ScrewCaptain27
577
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 01:13
Location: Udine, Italy

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

tpe wrote:
08 Feb 2023, 00:49
Vanja #66 wrote:
07 Feb 2023, 13:29
They are sticking to tradition - no continuity with naming :mrgreen:
Unlike F2000-F2008
You forgot about the 248 F1 in 2006
"Stupid people do stupid things. Smart people outsmart each other, then themselves."
- Serj Tankian

wuzak
wuzak
467
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

ScrewCaptain27 wrote:
08 Feb 2023, 01:23
tpe wrote:
08 Feb 2023, 00:49
Vanja #66 wrote:
07 Feb 2023, 13:29
They are sticking to tradition - no continuity with naming :mrgreen:
Unlike F2000-F2008
You forgot about the 248 F1 in 2006

Which was a throwback to their naming system for the 1960s to 1980s. That is 24 for 2.4L and 8 for 8 cylinders.

User avatar
F1NAC
170
Joined: 31 Mar 2013, 22:35

Re: Ferrari 675 Speculation Thread

Post

According to Duchessa, shakedown will take place on 15th.