The rules specify the size of the bodywork in that area.
If they didn't have a shark fin the engine cover would have to come up to that line.
So having a bigger shark fin means they have a smaller engine cover.
The rules specify the size of the bodywork in that area.
Perspective and lent distortion will modify both...gordonthegun wrote: ↑03 Feb 2023, 00:21Perspective changes the height of the fin, but (maybe) not the angle formed by the edge of the fin with the profile of the engine cover.Goblin42 wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 20:36as Vanja said perspective is a factor
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fn-remsXgAI ... =4096x4096
In the photo, that angle is wider than any other on the F1-75 in the same context.
Anyway, the photo might be a fake, so let's not consider it too seriously.
https://i0.wp.com/f1ingenerale.com/wp-c ... errari.jpg
How important is a fire up, when technically there is barely any room for engine development?
For Ferrari they have a lot of scope to improve engine-wise over last year. But I agree. Start-ups are just promotion of course
For Ferrari they have a lot of scope to improve engine-wise over last year. But I agree. Start-ups are just promotion of course
Worth a read for sure.According to reports, the new Ferrari chassis is 2/3 kg lighter than that of the F1-75 . Weight loss which is equivalent to 1 tenth.
You forgot about the 248 F1 in 2006