Alpine dropped the whole sidepod, not just the waterslide. The top SIS almost protrudes from the bodywork over its entire length.
And moved back?Blackout wrote: ↑23 Feb 2023, 13:47Alpine dropped the whole sidepod, not just the waterslide. The top SIS almost protrudes from the bodywork over its entire length.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FppdmiSWYAU ... =4096x4096
I dont think so.johnny comelately wrote: ↑23 Feb 2023, 13:49And moved back?Blackout wrote: ↑23 Feb 2023, 13:47Alpine dropped the whole sidepod, not just the waterslide. The top SIS almost protrudes from the bodywork over its entire length.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FppdmiSWYAU ... =4096x4096
Nice spot on the extension to the keel. Did they all do this independently, or did someone have that in 2022 and others have followed suit?Blackout wrote: ↑23 Feb 2023, 14:31I dont think so.johnny comelately wrote: ↑23 Feb 2023, 13:49And moved back?Blackout wrote: ↑23 Feb 2023, 13:47Alpine dropped the whole sidepod, not just the waterslide. The top SIS almost protrudes from the bodywork over its entire length.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FppdmiSWYAU ... =4096x4096
The sidepod inlet is more forward.... maybe the cokpit is more backward...
I think Alpine too created that small extension/keel on the lower nose edges to mount the bottom wishbone trailing arm lower (yellow arrow) (like Ferrari & RB/AT)
#downwash
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FpprvEyWAAA ... name=large
Yeah I noticed that nnd I noticed what you said about the water slide retaining somewhat of an S shape.Blackout wrote: ↑23 Feb 2023, 13:47Alpine dropped the whole sidepod, not just the waterslide. The top SIS almost protrudes from the bodywork over its entire length.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FppdmiSWYAU ... =4096x4096
Thanks. This means the Alpine is near the minimum weight of the minium weight*?