If the teams create new series, they will have that much more to spend

Not if Bernie has them under contract, and pursues it in court.woohoo wrote:remember guys, as it is now Bernie and co. take about 50% of the teams monies.
If the teams create new series, they will have that much more to spend
“Apart from my contracts with teams, if somebody went to any of our contracted people, companies, television contractors, we would view it very seriously.
“That would be inducement to breach contracts and I don’t do that myself so I won’t stand back and let it happen. Any action could run to hundreds of millions of pounds, who knows how much?”
So the teams make token entries to fulfil the contract.Conceptual wrote:Not if Bernie has them under contract, and pursues it in court.woohoo wrote:remember guys, as it is now Bernie and co. take about 50% of the teams monies.
If the teams create new series, they will have that much more to spend
Providing they keep all there sponsors and get the same TV revenue which F1 gets now.woohoo wrote:remember guys, as it is now Bernie and co. take about 50% of the teams monies.
If the teams create new series, they will have that much more to spend
I wonder if just showing up with the 2006 cars (that will obviously not pass scrutineering) would fulfill the teams contracted obligations...kilcoo316 wrote:So the teams make token entries to fulfil the contract.Conceptual wrote:Not if Bernie has them under contract, and pursues it in court.woohoo wrote:remember guys, as it is now Bernie and co. take about 50% of the teams monies.
If the teams create new series, they will have that much more to spend
They are obliged to provide 2 cars for 18 races - no mention of how competitive they are.
What does the poison dwarf do then?
No. It won't.Conceptual wrote:That 50% will still goto Bernie if they decide to leave
They won't - that is why cost cutting is happening.astracrazy wrote:Providing they keep all there sponsors and get the same TV revenue which F1 gets now.
See mine.astracrazy wrote:The new series will not get as much commercial revenue as F1.
Most engineers are quite well rounded, and quite educated to the ways of the world. We all have to do accounting,law and business as part of degrees these days.Conceptual wrote:But, once again, as kilcoo continues to say, I am clueless. It is amazing how an engineer knows so much about business. Or pretends to at least...
kilcoo316 wrote: So the teams make token entries to fulfil the contract.
They are obliged to provide 2 cars for 18 races - no mention of how competitive they are.
What does the poison dwarf do then?
kilcoo316 wrote: As I have also said if needs be, certain FOTA teams might have to make a token representation in FOM-F1, so what - run the 2009 cars, who cares if your uncompetitive. If you fail to pre-qualify, so much the better.
The teams can quite easily fulfil the leagal wording of their contracts while making an absolute farce out of FOM-F1.
If I were the teams, I would put large "FOTA 2010" stickers all over the cars, team uniforms, driver's hats during interviews etc. beginning Friday. What can Max do about that? He can get mad, that is what. But he can't prevent it.
Maybe what the teams should do is both. Commit to the FIA/FOM series, run on a budget of $500,000 with old cheap cars, no hospitality, no motor homes, no sponsorship, no sharing of their engines with the "new F1 teams", plaster their car with FOTA stickers and let Max have his spec car series. At the same time they could run serious FOTA races with real budgets, real sponsors, real drivers and real financial terms.
kilcoo316 wrote: Contracts with teams?
You don't have any you stunted dwarf - there is no concorde at the moment.
Contracted people?
Are you arrogant enough to think FOM personnel are the only ones capable of organising motor races - pathetic... Small angry man syndrome from the poison dwarf.
Regardless, people resign from jobs all the time. Often because they have been made offers elsewhere, its called business Bernie. Something similar to the way you play circuits against one another.
Contracted companies (inc. TV)?
That is between FOM and the respective companies.
If the teams make them an offer to sponsor/cover a separate racing series, that is absolutely nothing to do with you.
Contrary to bearing his fangs - this shows how toothless the vertically challenged one is right now. If the teams walk, there is really very little FOM can do to stop them or the circuits setting up a new series.
Sponsors will inevitable follow the publicity - and it will not be with FOM-F1.
Ferrari is publicity.astracrazy wrote:publicity being your important word