Several reasons. It's intended for an orbital rocket, which needs to carry both fuel and oxidizer for use outside of the atmosphere. Reacting fuel with oxidizer directly also provides a more energetic reaction which rocket engines are reliant upon to achieve combustion chamber pressure, exhaust velocity, and sufficient thrust. To do this with air (w only 10% oxidizer) would alter the rocket design. Air breathing rockets are conceptualized and usually involved some sort of compression of the air consumed in the combustion chamber, either by super or hypersonic compression as in ramjets or by liquifying the air with cryogenic heat exchangers as with the Skylon.
I thought you were speaking of the rde turbine generator. Upon more research, I've seen that a 2-3 cm annular diameter would only need 1.5bar to operate, but the devil is in the fuelling.vorticism wrote: ↑02 Apr 2023, 21:25Several reasons. It's intended for an orbital rocket, which needs to carry both fuel and oxidizer for use outside of the atmosphere. Reacting fuel with oxidizer directly also provides a more energetic reaction which rocket engines are reliant upon to achieve combustion chamber pressure, exhaust velocity, and sufficient thrust. To do this with air (w only 10% oxidizer) would alter the rocket design. Air breathing rockets are conceptualized and usually involved some sort of compression of the air consumed in the combustion chamber, either by super or hypersonic compression as in ramjets or by liquifying the air with cryogenic heat exchangers as with the Skylon.
Yes. Sounds like a great challenge to the teams. If F1 remains hybrid, I believe a gas turbine generator will be the way of the future
RDE is more efficient exhaust generator, has zero moving parts, and can have multiple detonation waves concurrently. also, it has noise.
do you mean gas generator ? (ie producing high pressure/velocity gas)
What am I missing here? Your post history seems clear that you are intelligent enough to get what I posted.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 10:53do you mean gas generator ? (ie producing high pressure/velocity gas)
"zero moving parts"
how does the air get compressed ? - (in a vehicle doing 30 - 180 mph)
losing the 8 speed gearbox will degrade the electrical side
Well, it only exists in your fantasy so far.
His question about preparation of the oxidizer emboldened above. You need compression to raise the temp & density of the fuel-air mixture for proper combustion in a jet/ICE configuration. However you also said you want this thing to operate nearer to 1 bar (presumably on the infeed side) while producing supersonic combustion (detonation); otoh the known ways of doing that involve explosives. At which point we're getting into unconventional fuel sources in order to pull off this 1 bar feed-side fuel-oxidizer monopropellant solid state detonation gas generator.Zynerji wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 13:23What am I missing here?Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑04 Apr 2023, 10:53
how does the air get compressed ? - (in a vehicle doing 30 - 180 mph)