Guys, I have another "invention" for F1 that's not really an invention at all.
I believe some other racing series may already have started doing it. What I'm bringing up is hot-swap-able energy stores.
In 2026 the electrical contribution to power will be 50% and the fuel, or rather the energy from fuel, will be limited over the race to approximately 70% of what it is now. This means that very likely a bigger energy store will come into play.
Since the rules are not yet finalized, it is not clear yet how the bigger energy store might be managed. I am thinking in the case were the energy store is non-sustainable at max charge over the race, or in other words, the energy garnered from KERS (no MGUH anymore!) is less than the potential allowed discharge rate - or simply put a single battery starts the race at 100% SOC and maxes out at say, 50% at the end of the race - The rules could be made to allow battery swaps!
That is teams can choose to sacrifice a longer pit stop to swap their 50% (consecutive lap max charge) for a fully 100% charged battery that can give a few more seconds of pace to gain some positions. It would be fun to work out how many kilowatt hours of energy store plus new tyres can make this difference over a given stint, if the rules were fashioned for this. It won't be as extreme as Formula e where you are dead in the water without a battery swap. It would be milder, more manageable drop in pace than anything else, where your big is a "dead weight" and it would be attractive to "hot swap it" in a pit stop.
So yeah, so the engineering side now bring this thought to the discussion, how energy dense are expecting batteries to be to make them small enough to swap under the chassis (skid plate and all) or even from the side of chassis? Current batteries are regulated to 20kg? but most if it is ballast. What if we hot swap a 40kg battery? And how many kWhrs would that contain? It's a fascinating premise.