They should have called it GOAT of statistics to be more appropriate. If the list doesn't contain the likes of Clark, Stewart, Lauda, Hunt, Prost, Vettel and Alonso, then it makes perfect sense to call it GOAT of statistics.
What kind of mental orgasam people get by conducting or participating in such polls which are devoid of even basic rationality? How can you compare drivers across generations? How is that so many talented drivers not part of such a discussion just because they didn't get the winning equipment continuously? These polls are absolute junk in my opinion.