Russell is performing better than Hamilton again this season, but you don't see it in points since Russell's car and his team weren't up to the job a few times. Same with Leclerc and Sainz.
Russell is performing better than Hamilton again this season, but you don't see it in points since Russell's car and his team weren't up to the job a few times. Same with Leclerc and Sainz.
I don’t think this is necessarily true. Open to a lot of context, circumstance, and subjective interpretation.Henri wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 10:24Sainz is performing better than leclerc this seasonVanja #66 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 08:31If it's really the case what Andi said, that they didn't have a tyre department for a while, it's not as surprising. Modelling tyres for any simulation is very, very hard work and requires a lot of attention, time and correlation data.
I get why they compared best laps from two seasons, but we can't look over the fact Leclerc was 3.5 tenths faster than Sainz last year in first two sectors, skewing all the findings highly in favour of Mercedes and Red Bull.
Without the engine failure at Bahrain and grid drop at Monaco due to Xavi, Leclerc would have 3 podiums to Sainz's 0 (not to mention the points that sainz inherited due to charles' misfortunes)Henri wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 10:24Sainz is performing better than leclerc this seasonVanja #66 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 08:31If it's really the case what Andi said, that they didn't have a tyre department for a while, it's not as surprising. Modelling tyres for any simulation is very, very hard work and requires a lot of attention, time and correlation data.
I get why they compared best laps from two seasons, but we can't look over the fact Leclerc was 3.5 tenths faster than Sainz last year in first two sectors, skewing all the findings highly in favour of Mercedes and Red Bull.
Yes, I forget that moment for the missing tire department which is crucial and Andy mention it several times.
In the race there was actually pretty much no deficit outside the first stint in which clearly the car wasn't working correctly with the hard tyres.organic wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 12:48Without the engine failure at Bahrain and grid drop at Monaco due to Xavi, Leclerc would have 3 podiums to Sainz's 0 (not to mention the points that sainz inherited due to charles' misfortunes)Henri wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 10:24Sainz is performing better than leclerc this seasonVanja #66 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 08:31
If it's really the case what Andi said, that they didn't have a tyre department for a while, it's not as surprising. Modelling tyres for any simulation is very, very hard work and requires a lot of attention, time and correlation data.
I get why they compared best laps from two seasons, but we can't look over the fact Leclerc was 3.5 tenths faster than Sainz last year in first two sectors, skewing all the findings highly in favour of Mercedes and Red Bull.
Charles also was close to a Monaco pole which could've been a Ferrari win in another world. Only 2 hundredths off Alonso.
It's a tale as old as time with leclerc & sainz. Sainz beat Leclerc on points in '21 but leclerc's season was far better. Same is true here so far.
Leclerc is the benchmark in Ferrari. It's very rare that sainz consistently beats Charles consistently for an entire weekend. Don't let the recent Spain's wild pace deficit of charles' car affect your opinion disproportionately
.. what does Hamilton have to do with sainz getting the best out of car .
Sainz out qualifyed and had better pace than leclerc in spain.. sainz a smooth operator
if if if iforganic wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 12:48Without the engine failure at Bahrain and grid drop at Monaco due to Xavi, Leclerc would have 3 podiums to Sainz's 0 (not to mention the points that sainz inherited due to charles' misfortunes)Henri wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 10:24Sainz is performing better than leclerc this seasonVanja #66 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 08:31
If it's really the case what Andi said, that they didn't have a tyre department for a while, it's not as surprising. Modelling tyres for any simulation is very, very hard work and requires a lot of attention, time and correlation data.
I get why they compared best laps from two seasons, but we can't look over the fact Leclerc was 3.5 tenths faster than Sainz last year in first two sectors, skewing all the findings highly in favour of Mercedes and Red Bull.
Charles also was close to a Monaco pole which could've been a Ferrari win in another world. Only 2 hundredths off Alonso.
It's a tale as old as time with leclerc & sainz. Sainz beat Leclerc on points in '21 but leclerc's season was far better. Same is true here so far.
Leclerc is the benchmark in Ferrari. It's very rare that sainz consistently beats Charles consistently for an entire weekend. Don't let the recent Spain's wild pace deficit of charles' car affect your opinion disproportionately
And none of the ifs are down to Charles.Alonsismo wrote: ↑10 Jun 2023, 01:06if if if iforganic wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 12:48Without the engine failure at Bahrain and grid drop at Monaco due to Xavi, Leclerc would have 3 podiums to Sainz's 0 (not to mention the points that sainz inherited due to charles' misfortunes)
Charles also was close to a Monaco pole which could've been a Ferrari win in another world. Only 2 hundredths off Alonso.
It's a tale as old as time with leclerc & sainz. Sainz beat Leclerc on points in '21 but leclerc's season was far better. Same is true here so far.
Leclerc is the benchmark in Ferrari. It's very rare that sainz consistently beats Charles consistently for an entire weekend. Don't let the recent Spain's wild pace deficit of charles' car affect your opinion disproportionately
Sainz is trusted more by the team.. which is obviousorganic wrote: ↑10 Jun 2023, 01:32And none of the ifs are down to Charles.Alonsismo wrote: ↑10 Jun 2023, 01:06if if if iforganic wrote: ↑09 Jun 2023, 12:48
Without the engine failure at Bahrain and grid drop at Monaco due to Xavi, Leclerc would have 3 podiums to Sainz's 0 (not to mention the points that sainz inherited due to charles' misfortunes)
Charles also was close to a Monaco pole which could've been a Ferrari win in another world. Only 2 hundredths off Alonso.
It's a tale as old as time with leclerc & sainz. Sainz beat Leclerc on points in '21 but leclerc's season was far better. Same is true here so far.
Leclerc is the benchmark in Ferrari. It's very rare that sainz consistently beats Charles consistently for an entire weekend. Don't let the recent Spain's wild pace deficit of charles' car affect your opinion disproportionately
We should judge on performance rather than a table, otherwise unfavourable situations occur.
Say you're the team boss and judge just looking at the wdc table. Naturally coming into '22 you will favour Carlos as leader of the team since he comfortably beat Charles in '21 in his first year at the team in an unfamiliar team, setup etc. And he has now had time to settle in, so surely he'll be even better..
Oh wait, Charles completely wiped the floor with Carlos last year as soon as the car was good.
Carlos had a large shunt at Monaco . Probably more costly than what Charles has done this season given how hard Carlos' was into metal barrier rather than tecpro.
Both are performing worse than team mates, but got more points with better luck. It will turn around, it's a long season.
That's a form of being faster. Kind of sad that they're clueless and lost apparentlyVanja #66 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2023, 13:01Their post-race reactions point to them being trully shocked the updates didn't solve the problems they expected at all. Updates were never made to make the car faster, but provide more consistency in the race regarding tyre behaviour. Aero updates don't directly influence tyres of course, so my guess is they wanted to try different suspension settings and updated parts allowed them to explore this area without hurting aerodynamic performance. Seeing what updates were aimed at, they expected better consistency of floor performance in the rear corner area.
What do you base this on? That they mainly have suspension issues, or at all? I consider it highly unlikely that they don't have a hefty aero handicap. By the looks of it Ferrari and Williams has the dumbest, plainest floor.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2023, 13:01They didn't say updates made things worse of course, but they underestimated the in-race tyre management issue they have (or believed some changes in suspension setup could make up for that). Overall, as I repeatedly pointed out since the Bahrain Q - downforce and aerodynamics is not the core problem of the 2023 car, the suspension is. The only aero problem they have is insufficient front wing downforce. Since their front wing has the smallest planform area of any car (and a lot, lot smaller area than 2022 car) it's not like it's an impossible problem to solve. Them not prioritising it means it's not the biggest problem of the car and it clearly isn't.