
complete nonsense, yeah. How do the rules even allow this, and does the result still officially count?
The sun isn’t particularly strong. Will take quite a while for the track to dry. It won't be competitive in time.search wrote:complete nonsense, yeah. How do the rules even allow this, and does the result still officially count?
I mean, it obviously would most likely change nothing about the result if they continued, but how can they just decide to stop qualifying?
Come on now. They have weather radars. That storm looked like a scene from some apocalypse movie, you think it was going to pass and give a dry track within 4 minutes?
Was he 1st on track in Q3 ?
no, 99,9% not, but I'd like to know who is allowed to make a decision like this, and on what grounds. I mean, it took them like a minute.Cs98 wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 21:21Come on now. They have weather radars. That storm looked like a scene from some apocalypse movie, you think it was going to pass and give a dry track within 4 minutes?![]()
![]()
Umm, common sense?search wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 21:24no, 99,9% not, but I'd like to know who is allowed to make a decision like this, and on what grounds. I mean, it took them like a minute.
Not sure what difference that makes. You dont start the race on your Q3 position.
No, not 99,9%. Literally 100%. Unless the sun explodes that amount of water is not clearing in 4 minutes. There's absolutely zero uncertainty here. These complaints are just misguided. And the race director is the obvious answer to your question.search wrote: ↑03 Nov 2023, 21:24no, 99,9% not, but I'd like to know who is allowed to make a decision like this, and on what grounds. I mean, it took them like a minute.