We have to define terms "revolution" and "evolution".Vanja #66 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2023, 09:45He said 95% as way of saying a lot of things will have to change. 23 car had more than 95% new parts compared to 22 car, but it wasn't 95% new the way 24 car will be.gordonthegun wrote: ↑20 Dec 2023, 23:41Well, from a now reliable source we know that the 676 will have 95% of the components different from the old SF-23 (which is normal) but Vasseur says that the car will be different but not revolutionised.
Revolution I understand something like fundamental changes, in this case aero concept, suspension concept etc.
Evolution like improving of something that already exist.
This is in general...
Then, we know that they plan to move SIS in the floor which means more space for undercut for example.
In-wash, down wash or in-wash/down-wash we'll see etc.
However my opinion that we are talking for evolution, cause we already know and have in practice all these elaborations.
Revolution was designing ground effect cars i.e. we have revolution with 2022 cars which was fundamental change in respect to previous ones.
Is it possible for someone to create elaboration/interpretation of current rules which is unseen to present day, I do not know and that would be in some way revolution.
Also, my opinion is that discussions about whether the new Red car will be revolution or evolution is quite useless.
All these are my opinions.
Maybe I am not right, but also I am not wrong