SSJ4 wrote: ↑20 Mar 2024, 18:44
https://www.funoanalisitecnica.com/2024 ... bourn.html
found this quite interesting.
The No. 14 single-seater seemed good in slow corners, but was at a disadvantage to its rivals in the medium fast. The new front suspension seems to benefit in terms of mechanical grip, however, the extreme design based on maximum tapering of the area does not seem useful in terms of efficiency. In addition, the AMR24 does not appear to be equipped with a DRS system capable of providing large deltas between the start and end of the usage section, although many believe it is.
So I have problems believing any of what he wrote. If I'm reading the chart correctly, I can see the data for the DRS chart doesn't take into account which lap the DRS was deployed. LeClerc last use of DRS would have been the last or second to last Lap. While Russel and Alonso's use of the DRS would have been before the accident ...so lap 3? Many of Hamilton's DRS times were with the soft compound, while others on Hards or Mediums, all that will have effects on traction levels. I also saw Russel hitting speeds in excess of 320 without the DRS, making me question other data he's using.
I tried to use F1 Tempo to analyse the difference but even that would be hard to calculate. After I generated the graphs, I noticed the fastest laps were all created at different laps. I dropped LeClerc's Lap 50 fastest lap cause it was the only one that used DRS for their fastest lap.
I noted below the Fastest laps that I looked at, then calculated the lap times based on if they all had tried generate their fastest lap on lap 50. I'm assuming that each lap of fuel is costing you a tenth of a second in lap time.
Time Adj
LAP LapTime .1/lap@50
VER 50 1:31.8 1:31.8
LEC 49 1:31.9 1:31.8
PIA 45 1:32.3 1:31.8
ALO 43 1:32.4 1:31.7
A weight of a lap of fuel costs at lease a tenth of a second in lap time. So how do we really compare any of the numbers he's talking about. I think it's garbage in and he'd handing us garbage out.