-wkst- wrote: ↑23 Mar 2024, 16:16
issey wrote: ↑23 Mar 2024, 15:14
-wkst- wrote: ↑23 Mar 2024, 14:07
I guess you check the facts onceagain and may be be a bit more cautious regarding words like „definitely“.
Talking with you is useless cause you don’t want to accept other opinions, everyone needs to be ur opinion.
When I check the facts than I’m seeing that Alonso was faster than the McLaren until his error and floor damage and with a good lap he would’ve "definitely" take Norris place
Ps: Maybe you should check the facts about the 2 set of softs in Q2 too.
It's not an opinion when you just spray fake news:
Q2:
Ferrari: 1 used new set - first outing scrubbed set - second outing new set
Red Bull: 1 used new set - only one outing with a new set
McLaren: 1 used new set - first outing new set - second outing scrubbed set
Alonso: 2 used new sets - first outing new set - second outing new set
Stroll already had to use 2 new sets in Q1, only had one fresh for Q2 and Q3...
ALO did a 17.1 in his first Q2 attempt with new tyres - 5 tenths slower than PIA (also with new tyres) and 4 tenths slower than NOR (also with new tyres)
ALO did a 16.7 in his second Q2 attempt with new tyres - still slower than the earlier McLaren times
ALO also wasn't quicker than the McLaren in the first Q3 sector until the mistake.
So what are you talking? All what you wrote is just not true.
Q2 first attempt was on old tyres. In second attempt, his fastest time was set on his sixth lap and stroll set it on the fourth lap. Aston's pace was very confusing. Honestly though in Q3 the car had pace for P4, both the drivers did not extract it, making mistakes (but it also looked like the car couldn't get the tyres to work until the second lap)