Its that article a couple posts back .Alonso_fin wrote: ↑17 Apr 2024, 23:28Would be interested reading about this, is there a link to this article?
https://www.funoanalisitecnica.com/2024 ... -cina.html
Its that article a couple posts back .Alonso_fin wrote: ↑17 Apr 2024, 23:28Would be interested reading about this, is there a link to this article?
it has to be a little uncomfortable for him, waxing the floor with the bosses son week in and week out. im sure there is some truth to it, but there are a lot of drivers that can help develop the car while still scoring points every weekend. but whatever keeps the lights on haha-wkst- wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 08:40https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/alon ... /10599896/
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/asto ... /10599881/
Krack confirmed the deadline regarding the contract of ALO.
ALO himself made an interesting comment that it's sometimes a problem that he can drive around a problem, being less sensitive, and "needs" the help of his teammate (maybe also a comment to butter up the Stroll family...).
Maybe it's true and to some degree makes sense but sound really strange like when he said that Stroll was champion material or something like that.-wkst- wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 08:40https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/alon ... /10599896/
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/asto ... /10599881/
Krack confirmed the deadline regarding the contract of ALO.
ALO himself made an interesting comment that it's sometimes a problem that he can drive around a problem, being less sensitive, and "needs" the help of his teammate (maybe also a comment to butter up the Stroll family...).
Which is quite a sensible thing, because tracks like Miami and Shanghai are more common on the calendar.AR3-GP wrote: ↑16 Apr 2024, 21:01I don't think the article is saying they had correlation trouble. I think it's saying the effect of the upgrades will suit Shanghai and Miami more than Suzuka.SSJ4 wrote: ↑16 Apr 2024, 19:58I hope it’s not another year of this. How come red bulls upgrades general correlate with what they’re getting in windtunnel compared to most other teamsKimiRai wrote: ↑16 Apr 2024, 17:48Apparently, Stroll had a more loaded rear wing for qualifying and the race, which explains his frustration with top speed.
https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-as ... /10598610/
https://cdn-9.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -stro.webp
Also this:
Hungary 2006 is calling (yes different name, but same team in essence)
xReVo wrote: ↑17 Apr 2024, 13:23They also said this about the AMR23 and at the start of the world championship it was second force. For me this reasoning doesn't exist, if you have capable people you win. Newey is a case of winning everywhere he went (Williams, McLaren and Redbull). You don't need any experience at the top, you need good engineers who make you the best car, end of story. Progression does not exist, as demonstrated by amr23 and even more so by McL60.Andres125sx wrote: ↑17 Apr 2024, 08:12Winning before existing is quite dificult
This act of doing everything calmly is not a decision, but how things work. None said "I don´t wanna win yet"
Brawn GP was the exception, not the norm. It was a new ruleset, they found a loophole and did exploit it perfectly. But that was a rare exception, no other team in all F1 history won at their debut, so using a rare exception as a reference, can only cause loads of frustration
There´s no stupid people in F1, all teams have very competent people even if armchair experts usually think otherwise, so no matter how good is your strategy and work, there will be several other teams with very good strategy and work too, and in those scenarios, experience is key.
That is the reason no new teams win titles in normal conditions, they need to earn some experience fighting at the top