.
It is the same thing over and over again. The strategist is sooooo bad! Why doesn't Mekies see that?! Fire him!!
Yuki drove a great race, was constantly quicker than Ricciardo. Well deserved point! Could have been more.
.
I dont understand why the team didn’t put Yuki and Dan on the Medium tires for the last stint - Yuki could have bagged 2 points and Dan may have made up at least a couple of positions.
That was frustrating!Wouter wrote: ↑07 Jul 2024, 18:08.
It is the same thing over and over again. The strategist is sooooo bad! Why doesn't Mekies see that?! Fire him!!
Yuki drove a great race, was constantly quicker than Ricciardo. Well deserved point! Could have been more.
https://imgur.com/XXWokvQ.jpg
the real question is can daniel handle a car with loose rear end that what that article says.while the current redbull has a strong frontend it has a loose rear and thats why perez is struggling.the past v carb cars have been difficult to drive thats why results have been inconsistent.the way i read it is that riccardo needs a quick car in other to cover up some of his shortcoming.djos wrote: ↑07 Jul 2024, 15:10Except, all the reports agree that the GE RBR cars have all had a strong front end, and Daniel was fast in the RB19 at last year's Silverstone test.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/red-b ... /10437300/
Instead, he says the team has long had a history of producing cars with a strong front end, and it’s something he has simply learned to deal with.
“I don't think it has necessarily suited my driving style,” he said. “As a driver, you need to adapt to what you get, and that's also what I did when I joined Red Bull.
“The car was always like that, to be honest. It had a good front end, and I've never experienced a fast car with understeer in my life, in any category.
He tested last year car at silverstone and was almost as fast as verstappen.Bill wrote: ↑07 Jul 2024, 14:26As a driver you are expected to adapt unless you plan to write your own set of tech regulation.a very strong frontend won't work with ground effect car.it worked in the past because redbull had a high rake car.
The article is misleading. Horner is never quoted saying that Liam will not be able to jump straight into the Red Bull.runningmanz wrote: ↑09 Jul 2024, 01:35Horner downplays Liam's test and dismisses him jumping straight into the RBR.
"Lawson has been tipped as a contender for the seat should Perez be replaced, but Horner has dismissed the possibility of the Kiwi immediately taking the seat - although he wants to see more from Perez.
"I'm actually doing a lap at Silverstone in the RB8 on Thursday as well, so you never know," Horner told media including RacingNews365.
"In all seriousness, the Liam test is aero run has been planned for a couple of months now, but of course, Checo is under pressure, that's normal in Formula 1."
https://racingnews365.com/horner-dismis ... s-on-perez
I think the article doesn’t include the full context of the interview. I would say the following section does strongly suggest he was asked if Liam was a contender and bats it away by asking if he was also a contender just because he’s driving an RB8.AR3-GP wrote: ↑09 Jul 2024, 01:42The article is misleading. Horner is never quoted saying that Liam will not be able to jump straight into the Red Bull.runningmanz wrote: ↑09 Jul 2024, 01:35Horner downplays Liam's test and dismisses him jumping straight into the RBR.
"Lawson has been tipped as a contender for the seat should Perez be replaced, but Horner has dismissed the possibility of the Kiwi immediately taking the seat - although he wants to see more from Perez.
"I'm actually doing a lap at Silverstone in the RB8 on Thursday as well, so you never know," Horner told media including RacingNews365.
"In all seriousness, the Liam test is aero run has been planned for a couple of months now, but of course, Checo is under pressure, that's normal in Formula 1."
https://racingnews365.com/horner-dismis ... s-on-perez
What Horner is quoted saying is that Liam's filming day drive is not a reaction to Perez's form, but rather something that was planned long ago.
There is actually no question or answer at all from Horner which suggest that Lawson cannot replace Perez later in the season. There is just one very misleading line from the article author with no attributable quotes from Horner to back it up. RN365 news website really declined when Dieter Rencken stopped writing for it. It just became a clickbait site like the others.
Tbh, I think the journos are just digging for anything to write a story on - there’s no way in hell RBR are going to repeat the mistake they made with Alex, and throw a junior driver in alongside Max before he’s ready."I'm actually doing a lap at Silverstone in the RB8 on Thursday as well, so you never know," Horner told media including RacingNews365.
"In all seriousness, the Liam test is aero run has been planned for a couple of months now, but of course, Checo is under pressure, that's that's normal in Formula 1.
yes we should believe anything redbull tell us.no one ever saw the results of those test.toraabe wrote: ↑08 Jul 2024, 15:27He tested last year car at silverstone and was almost as fast as verstappen.
Do you ever have anything positive to say? Every post of yours contains nothing but sour grapes, half baked conspiracy theories, and negativity towards Daniel!
I agree but it's Horner's version of a "non-answer", not a "No, never".djos wrote: ↑09 Jul 2024, 02:11I think the article doesn’t include the full context of the interview. I would say the following section does strongly suggest he was asked if Liam was a contender and bats it away by asking if he was also a contender just because he’s driving an RB8.
Tbh, I think the journos are just digging for anything to write a story on - there’s no way in hell RBR are going to repeat the mistake they made with Alex, and throw a junior driver in alongside Max before he’s ready."I'm actually doing a lap at Silverstone in the RB8 on Thursday as well, so you never know," Horner told media including RacingNews365.
"In all seriousness, the Liam test is aero run has been planned for a couple of months now, but of course, Checo is under pressure, that's that's normal in Formula 1.
True.AR3-GP wrote: ↑09 Jul 2024, 03:49I agree but it's Horner's version of a "non-answer", not a "No, never".djos wrote: ↑09 Jul 2024, 02:11I think the article doesn’t include the full context of the interview. I would say the following section does strongly suggest he was asked if Liam was a contender and bats it away by asking if he was also a contender just because he’s driving an RB8.
Tbh, I think the journos are just digging for anything to write a story on - there’s no way in hell RBR are going to repeat the mistake they made with Alex, and throw a junior driver in alongside Max before he’s ready."I'm actually doing a lap at Silverstone in the RB8 on Thursday as well, so you never know," Horner told media including RacingNews365.
"In all seriousness, the Liam test is aero run has been planned for a couple of months now, but of course, Checo is under pressure, that's that's normal in Formula 1.
At this point I believe Red Bull is considering all of it's drivers (Lawson, Tsunoda, Ricciardo) for the 2nd RBR seat. A decision hasn't been made. Perez has not technically triggered the performance clause yet.