2 tenths off pole? Nah. If Perez and Hamilton were ahead of McLaren too then I’d begin to wonder but they aren’t.Mclaren-Honda-1988 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024, 00:20Do you think that Mclaren might have been left behind by the other three competitors?
We've never seen a grid penalty At all for one driver being in the way of another with both on the cooldown lapsMclaren-Honda-1988 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024, 00:48Only 1 place grid penalty? Isn't the minimum 3 usually? Never seen an 1 place grid penalty before for that infringement.
I have never seen a grid penalty for impeding a driver on a cooldown lap, a driver on a hotlap, yes thats a 3 place grid penalty. Russell was even warned of the bunching on the radio, he just decided to drive straight into it.Mclaren-Honda-1988 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024, 00:48Only 1 place grid penalty? Isn't the minimum 3 usually? Never seen an 1 place grid penalty before for that infringement.
This may well turn out to be a deciding factor. 2 drivers who work together knowing what comes around goes around against 2 drivers who have their own scoreboard above that of the team. one of the cleverest and most important decisions of modern F1 in my opinion. Give today take tomorrow. both drivers and the team win out in the long runBen1980 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2024, 22:16I really hope it is. I hope Mclaren having 2 dogs will help. I'm unsure on Lewis at Ferrari, no matter who RB have in, will not be as good, and Merc have someone old enough to be my son, so will take a while.
Not so sure how much laptime there is to gain with these cars. Widening the working window is probably a bigger goal in general as it seems very easy to fall into traps with respect to car development.CjC wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024, 12:51Stella commenting on probably what we are all feeling.
A lot of laptime needs to be found over the winter to be in the 2025 championship fights.
McLaren need to ‘raise’ the bar’
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/mclar ... /10678213/
The answer is simple, they (Mclaren) are in different development plan/cylce to the other teams, they were slow at the start, fast in the middle and now again ''slow'' at the end. In addition, next year is an end of a rules era, so performance is converging on all fronts and next year will be a 0.1 up on one track and 0.2 down on another, similar to what has been going on for the 2nd half of this season, so whoever (I hope us) finds the best balance vs performance will win next year.f1isgood wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024, 13:26Not so sure how much laptime there is to gain with these cars. Widening the working window is probably a bigger goal in general as it seems very easy to fall into traps with respect to car development.CjC wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024, 12:51Stella commenting on probably what we are all feeling.
A lot of laptime needs to be found over the winter to be in the 2025 championship fights.
McLaren need to ‘raise’ the bar’
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/mclar ... /10678213/