One would call that…. ComicalEmag wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 19:17Celebrating Max's achievements shouldn't require diminishing the rest of the grid. Praising him is fine, but suggesting and constantly hinting others are unworthy is not.avantman wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 18:49Actually, yes he is. Wanna argue?Not at all. I personally do not think so, quite the opposite. I do consider this modern grid to be the most talented, skillful, well-trained and overall best ever. This grid is head and shoulders above anything we've seen in 80s, 90s and 2000s. No question about that whatsoever. And the fact that Max is considered simultaneously the fastest and overall best driver and by margin(by many) makes his achievements ever more special and elevates him as a driver up higher a historical scale of F1. We've been lucky to see that in our lifetimes because we won't see another driver like that any time soon. Why not celebrate that?
If you believe this is the most talented grid ever, then berating drivers for not being as good as a generational talent like Max is illogical. It's like calling elite footballers "horrible" for not being on the same level as Messi or Ronaldo.
I honestly find the backlash against McLaren drivers kind of pathetic. People say they're underperforming, yet they are 1-2 in the driver's standings and the team is massively ahead in the constructors'. Criticizing that level of success is just not a serious take and it's clearly driven from other motives. They're literally being called out for not winning hard enough?
Also don’t forget ‘Mclaren don’t deserve their success’


